From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: rva333@protonmail.com, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Flora Fu <flora.fu@mediatek.com>,
Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add mt6572 support
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:20:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c112acd-5709-4144-9cab-54e0a51eefc9@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714-6572-pwrap-v1-3-d8e5a39cf7ef@protonmail.com>
On 7/14/26 14:42, Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Roman Vivchar <rva333@protonmail.com>
>
> Add mt6572 registers and platform data for the pmic wrapper.
> The mt2701 SoC-specific initialization function is used because they
> share the same GPS_INTF settings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Vivchar <rva333@protonmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index a4b10b0a97cb..4b8a5dc80a36 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -569,6 +569,96 @@ static const int mt2701_regs[] = {
> [PWRAP_ADC_RDATA_ADDR2] = 0x154,
> };
>
..snip..
>
> +static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6572 = {
> + .regs = mt6572_regs,
MT6572 only has PWRAP_OP_TYPE, PWRAP_MSB_FIRST, PWRAP_GPS_STA additional registers
compared to MT2701, and the three are currently unused.
Instead of adding yet one more huge array for 3 more registers, since I'm mostly
sure that those will never be used anyway (happy if you prove me wrong!), you can
at this point just use mt2701_regs for mt6572.
Perhaps, add a comment saying that MT6572 does indeed have those additional regs
but were omitted because currently unused.
So, something like
/*
* MT6572 has additional registers OP_TYPE (0x10), MSB_FIRST (0x14), GPS_STA (0x40)
* which were omitted as they're currently unused in this driver.
* Apart from that, the register map matches the one from MT2701.
*/
static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6572 = {
.regs = mt2701_regs,
Cheers,
Angelo
> + .type = PWRAP_MT6572,
> + .arb_en_all = 0x1ff,
> + .int_en_all = 0x7ffffffd,
> + .int1_en_all = 0,
> + .spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
> + .wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
> + .caps = PWRAP_CAP_RESET | PWRAP_CAP_DCM,
> + .init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
> + .init_soc_specific = pwrap_mt2701_init_soc_specific,
> +};
> +
> static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6765 = {
> .regs = mt6765_regs,
> .type = PWRAP_MT6765,
> @@ -2446,6 +2556,7 @@ static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8186 = {
>
> static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt2701 },
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6572-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6572 },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6765-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6765 },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6779-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6779 },
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6795-pwrap", .data = &pwrap_mt6795 },
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 12:42 [PATCH 0/3] soc: mediatek: pwrap: mt6572 support + log level fixes Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay
2026-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: pwrap: add mt6572 Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay
2026-07-15 10:20 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] soc: mediatek: pwrap: use correct log level Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay
2026-07-15 10:20 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add mt6572 support Roman Vivchar via B4 Relay
2026-07-15 10:20 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2026-07-15 11:24 ` Roman Vivchar
2026-07-15 12:01 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c112acd-5709-4144-9cab-54e0a51eefc9@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=amergnat@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=flora.fu@mediatek.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rva333@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox