Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/panthor: add no_clocks soc_data member for MT8196

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>]

Il 17/09/25 14:22, Nicolas Frattaroli ha scritto:
> While panthor does not try to do anything untoward with the core clock
> outside of increasing its enable/disable count, the spirit of using DT
> to describe hardware, not what drivers need, informs us that on the
> MT8196, panthor should work without one, as the true owner of the clocks
> in this case is the performance-domain.
> 
> Add a boolean to the soc_data struct that tells panthor whether on any
> given SoC, it can leave even the core clock NULL. Set it to true for the
> MT8196 soc_data instance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>

The only doubt that I have here is about the "no_clocks" name, as it may be read
as "number of clocks" ("no" is often used as "number").

I don't really have any better name to suggest though, and the execution is right,
so.....

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Cheers,
Angelo