From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1364DC433EF for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:10:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=/D1bdWxc7Q9mPJTg5gFFeZCHNLcO0EQLgU7BJhyLCyM=; b=bOeKVZBeAzEjkW Suh1PR0A+dgKPM5SCrZn0zi/RuY4giqJVoM+Dt+xUwbs7n8g6M3+CbWlZUfJb03bFrhMfOxMH++ju XLe/hkK6DZbddPvbKQTEdctIbBgao7Nb2cEnVc6ph3WIRxDFT2xQtyMA+pvQVz0V8mnrlXnIY5MlQ DW0S1TjoIL0oVGkcUZeFsfI2lwv44tyjuDOR34cS/pZw6+xRPrCokTTB7E8kTT3IVX1R5sSMds74l yMJ8y9qlvvRdt1pCj/qP9Y1As3DmcrHHrlCN10x+DZJnrlFenP98OG0xOf5JAftZ35DWpfuDHVGzs EYZJT2YSpggK7Q3MK/hw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mvbue-001IDu-AN; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:09:56 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mvbuO-001ICA-OK; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:09:42 +0000 X-UUID: e99bfde9133f4d3aa712d21ebb1cea5d-20211210 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=CjU98ycZMFvnEF82w0kKkH98J8lMsWvawl0iNRUhs7E=; b=fwinEs7kZI5egOftigkaEid8uXIUP+Ftw95O6ScgGbk+2MGGfjJvqo3fXbE7lBEX6xntnutuPDBQ01D3epnNz+zCs47UfoZyzUR5N7kPjXWQZcX8HK8p/j01sSx4Slufw3zYJ4EZc04+yhpsHDCmgBvss1c54R24cYCrYodUblc=; X-UUID: e99bfde9133f4d3aa712d21ebb1cea5d-20211210 Received: from mtkcas67.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.45)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 271663808; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 02:09:34 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 01:09:33 -0800 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:09:31 +0800 Received: from mhfsdcap04 (10.17.3.154) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:09:30 +0800 Message-ID: <60212a8cba39939ff2bf48196cc37cb1a2eb20e4.camel@mediatek.com> Subject: Re: [RFC,v4,3/5] spi: mtk: Add mediatek SPI Nand Flash interface driver From: xiangsheng.hou To: Miquel Raynal CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:09:31 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20211209112030.5cdcd07c@xps13> References: <20211130083202.14228-1-xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com> <20211130083202.14228-4-xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com> <20211209112030.5cdcd07c@xps13> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211210_010940_824899_FE73590C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.04 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Miquel, On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 11:20 +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Hi Xiangsheng, > > xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com wrote on Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:32:00 +0800: > > > > > + > > +static int mtk_snfi_config(struct nand_device *nand, > > + struct mtk_snfi *snfi) > > +{ > > + struct mtk_ecc_engine *eng = mtk_snfi_to_ecc_engine(snfi); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + switch (nanddev_page_size(nand)) { > > + case 512: > > + val = PAGEFMT_512_2K | PAGEFMT_SEC_SEL_512; > > + break; > > + case KB(2): > > + if (eng->section_size == 512) > > + val = PAGEFMT_2K_4K | PAGEFMT_SEC_SEL_512; > > + else > > + val = PAGEFMT_512_2K; > > + break; > > + case KB(4): > > + if (eng->section_size == 512) > > + val = PAGEFMT_4K_8K | PAGEFMT_SEC_SEL_512; > > + else > > + val = PAGEFMT_2K_4K; > > + break; > > + case KB(8): > > + if (eng->section_size == 512) > > + val = PAGEFMT_8K_16K | PAGEFMT_SEC_SEL_512; > > + else > > + val = PAGEFMT_4K_8K; > > + break; > > + case KB(16): > > + val = PAGEFMT_8K_16K; > > + break; > > + default: > > + dev_err(snfi->dev, "invalid page len: %d\n", > > + nanddev_page_size(nand)); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + val |= eng->oob_per_section_idx << PAGEFMT_SPARE_SHIFT; > > + val |= eng->oob_free << PAGEFMT_FDM_SHIFT; > > + val |= eng->oob_free_protected << PAGEFMT_FDM_ECC_SHIFT; > > + writel(val, snfi->regs + NFI_PAGEFMT); > > Shouldn't this be calculated only once? Yes, The mtk_snfi_config function can be only called in prepare_io_req at the first time. I will add a variable to indicate config done or not to avoid calculate repeatedly. > > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int mtk_snfi_ecc_init_ctx(struct nand_device *nand) > > +{ > > + struct nand_ecc_engine_ops *ops = mtk_ecc_get_pipelined_ops(); > > + > > + return ops->init_ctx(nand); > > +} > > + > > +static void mtk_snfi_ecc_cleanup_ctx(struct nand_device *nand) > > +{ > > + struct nand_ecc_engine_ops *ops = mtk_ecc_get_pipelined_ops(); > > + > > + ops->cleanup_ctx(nand); > > +} > > + > > +static int mtk_snfi_ecc_prepare_io_req(struct nand_device *nand, > > + struct nand_page_io_req *req) > > +{ > > + struct nand_ecc_engine_ops *ops = mtk_ecc_get_pipelined_ops(); > > + struct mtk_snfi *snfi = mtk_nand_to_spi(nand); > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = mtk_snfi_config(nand, snfi); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + return ops->prepare_io_req(nand, req); > > +} > > + > > +static int mtk_snfi_ecc_finish_io_req(struct nand_device *nand, > > + struct nand_page_io_req *req) > > +{ > > + struct nand_ecc_engine_ops *ops = mtk_ecc_get_pipelined_ops(); > > + struct mtk_ecc_engine *eng = nand_to_ecc_ctx(nand); > > + struct mtk_snfi *snfi = mtk_nand_to_spi(nand); > > + > > + if (req->mode != MTD_OPS_RAW) > > + eng->read_empty = readl(snfi->regs + NFI_STA) & > > STA_EMP_PAGE; > > + > > + return ops->finish_io_req(nand, req); > > +} > > + > > + > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xiangsheng Hou "); > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mediatek SPI Nand Flash interface driver"); > > Otherwise looks good, I believe you can drop the RFC prefix now. > I will prepare the formal patch and send for review after internal review and test. Thanks Xiangsheng Hou _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek