From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F12FC35FFC for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 10:21:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From :Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=cp1oPo7ryv0hXZ0zKZ+Jf/Cwf+XFt5t/QCZJ7lczYrE=; b=jAACBSDYOhpBbziULXXFftXUnp dbE/LHdWAFkiV9MGdX5iR/3b42knP/B4+1m4Hg6k8YF7GzGvijOLw1SdTYPuUOe1b9UnaYupvozqF bQtNjiacX8o+qZxZ9CDw74nSTg+VuifYddVWDFL/HL7t1Nhz+imfrTe9nL+kmjAU+IbdL/8Go9fHA lt2i5hSGP5OkJ3vpn3iN4MY67tDvEVbAPmKEjoq6T0UAShbw9b9IYRUaWme7LULTARuWs99SxUXi7 9EAeJMBtsMDL/AS6aPDN3cfTd/xWgJHpxz/ojLmq9zybbkjyrZRifvfG6t5VYWg4/MDBfVVUWQElB HSKp9lSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tvvyx-0000000HFIR-0cWN; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 10:21:35 +0000 Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([2a01:4f8:242:246e::2] helo=sipsolutions.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tvvy3-0000000HF8p-1Vxo; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 10:20:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=cp1oPo7ryv0hXZ0zKZ+Jf/Cwf+XFt5t/QCZJ7lczYrE=; t=1742638839; x=1743848439; b=INCT2E57uizyg7YdDTq0DAAhk620eo2eyOdODBXT22Wep8Y D5wKIvjtzayaAtIQpCdDTzZ6iVap8vu4t1hY0+Qpt2mRFP3Q8B0BZ6sW9ZM5FvwdHmqeac4xySx3M jUKkP+Q7VwFJPyoWfsyMQgm25ISCs7gPoqRJSNrblw4HcGTZvGdgIooxSdf+m4CoWGYB+ZZvm/enU /yfc8FsUo8IhrJbmR610l0cnJGWSgBr2FM/4xLw7TfetH0HiGWQpAPilXFbJ0ETSMj5JjmRqMjv8G qDAinJN0crds24pszEJHVY40aDL6lqMJDhC1YYd8jhO1QqDnYvt/qzXs8BJnZ9EQ==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tvvxz-00000001vlm-17Bm; Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:20:35 +0100 Message-ID: <631977c57b2236edfefb8db7a28885ff6888c823.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mt76: mt7996: prevent uninit return in mt7996_mac_sta_add_links From: Johannes Berg To: Markus Elfring , Qasim Ijaz , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: LKML , Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno , Bo Jiao , Dan Carpenter , Felix Fietkau , Lorenzo Bianconi , Matthias Brugger , Peter Chiu , Ryder Lee , Sean Wang , Shayne Chen Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:20:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <061ebbe3-557b-46d7-acb8-308ae87105dd@web.de> References: <20250320201914.48159-1-qasdev00@gmail.com> <061ebbe3-557b-46d7-acb8-308ae87105dd@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250322_032039_396745_9B2C8E16 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.96 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 11:01 +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: >=20 > I suggest to avoid such repeated error code assignments. > Can an additional label be applied instead for this purpose? >=20 Please stop your "suggestions" on this list. None have really been helpful. johannes