From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>
Cc: akash.tyagi@mediatek.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
"T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>,
Isaac Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add PCP list for THP CMA
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:08:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dee6cd9-c67f-480f-b728-21c3a7b72004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJDx_ri==3SxFcuKXHpNjrtxbp0hLyhM+zXeJ-LQX38rfbUChw@mail.gmail.com>
On 05.08.25 18:57, Juan Yescas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:58 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 05.08.25 03:22, Juan Yescas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 11:50 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 04.08.25 20:20, Juan Yescas wrote:
>>>>> Hi David/Zi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason why the MIGRATE_CMA pages are not in the PCP lists?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are many devices that need fast allocation of MIGRATE_CMA pages,
>>>>> and they have to get them from the buddy allocator, which is a bit
>>>>> slower in comparison to the PCP lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> We also have cases where the MIGRATE_CMA memory requirements are big.
>>>>> For example, GPUs need MIGRATE_CMA memory in the ranges of 30MiB to 500MiBs.
>>>>> These cases would benefit if we have THPs for CMAs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could we add the support for MIGRATE_CMA pages on the PCP and THP lists?
>>>>
>>>> Remember how CMA memory is used:
>>>>
>>>> The owner allocates it through cma_alloc() and friends, where the CMA
>>>> allocator will try allocating *specific physical memory regions* using
>>>> alloc_contig_range(). It doesn't just go ahead and pick a random CMA
>>>> page from the buddy (or PCP) lists. Doesn't work (just imagine having
>>>> different CMA areas etc).
>>>>
>>>> Anybody else is free to use CMA pages for MOVABLE allocations. So we
>>>> treat them as being MOVABLE on the PCP.
>>>>
>>>> Having a separate CMA PCP list doesn't solve or speedup anything, really.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks David for the quick overview.
>>>
>>>> I still have no clue what this patch here tried to solve: it doesn't
>>>> make any sense.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The story started with this out of tree patch that is part of Android.
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1604282969.git.cgoldswo@codeaurora.org/T/#u
>>>
>>> This patch introduced the __GFP_CMA flag that allocates pages from
>>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE
>>> or MIGRATE_CMA. What it happens then, it is that the MIGRATE_MOVABLE
>>> pages in the
>>> PCP lists were consumed pretty fast. To solve this issue, the PCP
>>> MIGRATE_CMA list was added.
>>> This list is initialized by rmqueue_bulk() when it is empty. That's
>>> how we end up with the PCP MIGRATE_CMA list
>>> in Android. In addition to this, the THP list for MIGRATE_MOVABLE was
>>> allowed to contain
>>> MIGRATE_CMA pages. This is causing THP MIGRATE_CMA pages to be used
>>> for THP MIGRATE_MOVABLE
>>> making later allocations from THP MIGRATE_CMA to fail.
>>
>> Okay, so this patch here really is not suitable for the upstream kernel
>> as is. It's purely targeted at the OOT Android patch.
>>
> Right, it is a temporary solution for the pinned MIGRATE_CMA pages.
>
>>>
>>> These workarounds are mainly because we need to solve this issue upstream:
>>>
>>> - When devices reserve big blocks of MIGRATE_CMA pages, the
>>> underutilized MIGRATE_CMA
>>> can fall back to MIGRATE_MOVABLE and these pages can be pinned, so if
>>> we require MIGRATE_CMA
>>> pages, the allocations might fail.
>>>
>>> I remember that you presented the problem in LPC. Were you able to
>>> make some progress on that?
>>
>> There is the problem of CMA pages getting allocated by someone for a
>> MOVABLE allocation, to then short-term pin it for DMA. Long-term
>> pinnings are disallowed (we just recently fixed a bug where we
>> accidentally allowed it).
>>
> Nice, it is great the issue got caught and fixed upstream :)
>
>> One concern is that a steady stream of short-term pinnings can turn such
>> pages unmovable. We discussed ideas on how to handle that, but there is
>> no solution upstream yet.
>
> Are there any plans to continue the discussion? Is it in the priority
> list?
Ohh, it's somewheeeeeere on the todo list :)
Do you (or one of your colleagues) have capacity to work on that? One
idea was to flag folios as "pending on migration" and disallow any
further short-term pins until migration is done. IIRC, there were other
ideas (e.g., isolated pageblock).
> Maybe
> a topic we can discuss in LPC Japan?
Sounds good, feel free to propose this as a topic. I wills end out the
announcement of the MM MC probably next week.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAJDx_rgzkZognxWzOXJ-ZxdTtUaM3FT6bmpkwxMz03XiX3fKAQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-04 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Add PCP list for THP CMA David Hildenbrand
2025-08-04 19:00 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-04 19:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-05 1:24 ` Juan Yescas
2025-08-05 1:22 ` Juan Yescas
2025-08-05 9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-05 16:46 ` Juan Yescas
2025-08-05 17:12 ` Juan Yescas
2025-08-05 21:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-06 21:54 ` Juan Yescas
2025-08-05 9:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-05 16:57 ` Juan Yescas
2025-08-05 21:08 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-09-09 20:11 ` Juan Yescas
2025-07-24 7:53 akash.tyagi
2025-07-24 9:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-25 5:08 ` akash.tyagi
2025-07-25 7:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-25 14:27 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-29 12:30 ` akash.tyagi
2025-07-29 12:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-29 12:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-04 18:31 ` Juan Yescas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6dee6cd9-c67f-480f-b728-21c3a7b72004@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akash.tyagi@mediatek.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=isaacmanjarres@google.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).