From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org
Cc: matthias.bgg@gmail.com, jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com,
roger.lu@mediatek.com, hsinyi@google.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 10/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:20:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hfsmf37lq.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be86691b529dd691203fbb5b35f8572e7e9119a8.camel@mediatek.com>
Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:32 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> writes:
>>
>> > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
>> >
>> > For some MediaTek SoCs, like MT8186, it's possible that the sram
>> > regulator
>> > is shared between CPU and CCI.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
>>
>> nit: missing your sign-off.
>>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
>> > b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
>> > index 9e9bce0ff235..8f688d47e64b 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
>> > @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct
>> > mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu)
>> > }
>> >
>> > /* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases.
>> > */
>> > - info->sram_reg = regulator_get_exclusive(cpu_dev, "sram");
>> > + info->sram_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "sram");
>>
>> The changelog says that this regulator may be shared with CCI, so I
>> understand it's no longer exclusive. But here you make it optional,
>> which should be explained in the changelog. If it's not actually
>> optional, then it should just be normal "get".
>>
>> Kevin
>
> Hello Kevin,
>
> Since cpufreq and cci devfreq might share the same sram regulator in
> MediaTek SoC, it is no longer exclusive as you mentioned.
>
> The reason to use regulator_get_optional is we hope regulator framework
> can return error for error handling rather than a dummy handler from
> regulator_get api.
>
> I will add this to commit message in next version.
OK, sounds good.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-14 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-08 4:58 [PATCH V2 00/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup and support MT8183 and MT8186 Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:58 ` [PATCH V2 01/15] dt-bindings: cpufreq: mediatek: Add MediaTek CCI property Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 8:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-08 10:24 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 11:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-11 6:48 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:58 ` [PATCH V2 02/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Use module_init and add module_exit Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 3:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-08 4:58 ` [PATCH V2 03/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup variables and error handling in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init() Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 3:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-08 4:58 ` [PATCH V2 04/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Remove unused headers Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 3:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-08 4:58 ` [PATCH V2 05/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Enable clocks and regulators Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 3:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-08 4:58 ` [PATCH V2 06/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Record previous target vproc value Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 11:35 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-11 3:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-11 11:33 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 07/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Add opp notification for SVS support Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 11:31 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 20:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-11 11:29 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-11 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-12 8:18 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-12 18:04 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-13 11:21 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 08/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Move voltage limits to platform data Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 11:18 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 09/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Add .get function Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 10/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-08 20:32 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-14 10:53 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-14 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 11/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Update logic of voltage_tracking() Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 21:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-14 11:30 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 12/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Use maximum voltage in init stage Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-12 11:24 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-14 3:40 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 13/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Link CCI device to CPU Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 11:50 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 20:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-11 11:51 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-11 12:31 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-11 18:13 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-12 12:26 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-12 18:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-13 11:32 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-13 21:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-14 2:32 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-14 21:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-15 2:31 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-19 18:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 14/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-08 21:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2022-04-11 11:14 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 4:59 ` [PATCH V2 15/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Use device print to show logs Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 13:37 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-11 3:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2022-04-11 11:09 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-08 21:11 ` [PATCH V2 00/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Cleanup and support MT8183 and MT8186 Kevin Hilman
2022-04-09 1:05 ` Hsin-Yi Wang
2022-04-11 11:37 ` Rex-BC Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7hfsmf37lq.fsf@baylibre.com \
--to=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hsinyi@google.com \
--cc=jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=roger.lu@mediatek.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).