From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt76x0: run vco calibration for each channel configuration Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:40:19 +0300 Message-ID: <871s9r2d3g.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20180907211312.17918-1-lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com> <20180918114356.GB15285@redhat.com> <20180918120234.GD15285@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180918120234.GD15285-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Stanislaw Gruszka's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2018 14:02:35 +0200") Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , nbd-Vt+b4OUoWG0@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Stanislaw Gruszka writes: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 01:43:56PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: >> > According to vendor sdk, vco calibration has to be executed >> > for each channel configuration whereas mcu calibration has to be >> > performed during channel scanning. This patch fixes the mt76x0 >> > monitor mode issue since in that configuration vco calibration >> > was never executed >> > >> > Fixes: 10de7a8b4ab9 ("mt76x0: phy files") >> > Tested-by: Sid Hayn >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi >> >> Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka > > For the record this is 4.19 material. I really want to minimise conflicts and because of so many mt76 patches conflicts are likely to happen, so I'm keeping the bar high for mt76 patches going 4.19. Is this a regression from 4.18? If not, I think this should go to -next and cc stable. And besides, monitor mode isn't that critical anyway. -- Kalle Valo