From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wireless: mt76: call hweight8() instead of __sw_hweight8() Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 20:08:18 +0200 Message-ID: <877edxt1f1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1550469571-25933-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1550469571-25933-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1550469571-25933-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> (Masahiro Yamada's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:59:30 +0900") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau , Matthias Brugger List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Masahiro Yamada writes: > __sw_hweight8() is just internal implementation. > > Drivers should use the common API, hweight8(). > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Kalle Valo > This patch should go to x86 tree along with 2/2. > > Otherwise, all{yes,mod}config of x86 would be broken. > > This patch is trivial enough. > I want ACK from the net/wireless maintainer > so that this can go in via x86 tree. Sounds good to me, feel free to push via the x86 tree. -- Kalle Valo