From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: only schedule TXQ when reasonable airtime reporting
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 14:29:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s82ve1c.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c48c3555ab2261d6b6674ac7de8203359b80b127.1612529311.git.ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com> writes:
> For some drivers and hardware may report faulty airtime, which ends up
> with excessive hold time (~0.9s on mt7915 multiclent tests) impacting
> system performance.
>
> Although issue has been fixed in driver, but it make sense to select txqi
> depends on a reasonable airtime reporting to prevent such a case from
> happening again.
I think I see what you're trying to do with the patch, but this commit
message makes no sense. What, exactly, was the error you were seeing
that this is supposed to fix?
> Tested-by: Jiao Bo <jiao.bao@mediatek.com>
> Tested-by: Sujuan Chen <sujuan.chen@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
> ---
> net/mac80211/tx.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> index 6422da6690f7..0b8a8c3600f4 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> @@ -3770,6 +3770,10 @@ struct ieee80211_txq *ieee80211_next_txq(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 ac)
> sta->airtime_weight;
>
> if (deficit < 0 || !aql_check) {
> + if (txqi->schedule_round == local->schedule_round[ac])
> + goto out;
> +
> + txqi->schedule_round = local->schedule_round[ac];
I think this change may be worth making anyway, but for a different
reason: Without it, a station that fails aql_check will keep getting
recycled through the list, advancing its deficit. Which could actually
be the reason AQL breaks airtime fairness; did you observe any
difference in fairness with this change?
-Toke
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 12:55 [PATCH] mac80211: only schedule TXQ when reasonable airtime reporting Ryder Lee
2021-02-05 13:29 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-02-07 2:41 ` Ryder Lee
2021-02-08 14:53 ` Ryder Lee
2021-02-08 15:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878s82ve1c.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=shayne.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox