From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: mt7621-eth: Fix sparse warning in ethtool.c Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 13:41:33 +1000 Message-ID: <87po3i1dhu.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <20180329095637.GA16778@kroah.com> <20180329124745.24694-1-cmc@babblebit.net> <87vada1owt.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <1522638255.18424.44.camel@mtkswgap22> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1522638255.18424.44.camel@mtkswgap22> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sean Wang Cc: Chris Coffey , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Matthias Brugger , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 02 2018, Sean Wang wrote: > On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 09:34 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29 2018, Chris Coffey wrote: >>=20 >> > This fixes the following sparse warning: >> > >> > drivers/staging/mt7621-eth/ethtool.c:213:6: warning: symbol >> > 'mtk_set_ethtool_ops' was not declared. Should it be static? >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Coffey >>=20 >> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown >>=20 >> Thanks, >> NeilBrown >>=20 > Hi, Neil > > Forgive me I cannot find the cover letter in the original series in my > mailbox to make a reply, so I rudely made here just letting you know > something good to the growth of mt7621 support in upstream. > > do you have maintained an out-of-tree branch to boot the mt7621 machine > with those staging patches? I can boot v4.16 plus staging-next on my mt7621 with no other patches. An important fix (a63d706ea71919) landed in 4.16-rc7. It do have https://github.com/neilbrown/linux/commits/gnubee/v4.15 which was part of preparation for this, but now that very nearly all I need is in mainline or on its way, I won't be doing much more in that tree. > > If so, it would become a bit easier for me that maybe I could give a > hand for migrating these staging driver for mt7621 to mainline. I > thought mmc, pci, ethernet, gsw and hsdma all could probably reuse the > current mainline code. I agree that it is quite likely that several of these drivers could and should reuse current mainline code. I would love to have some help sorting this out. I won't have much time myself to dig into it for several weeks, but I'll make time to review and test any code that is contributed. Thanks, NeilBrown --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEG8Yp69OQ2HB7X0l6Oeye3VZigbkFAlrBpm4ACgkQOeye3VZi gbmclBAAm+NewuKw08BlxuB0AgbPrKV346xZiq5N/FdHhQDHIIob0GvAxAZmDtfi LrjAwO4gmliAFkY6vk6qcWSj8EmYxdn+t5gx1BJXaZaumJ5nZ64XtgZ2of/S7wkH fUwNzbAGsKe9IuXKPbXoJhvjITwTtMDii2FQ2YjIM6wBhWw6GIbmeUIm3aVRWB4W +wYdXo8pgYY6ULPdGwadxFh5xwrLk6sMIIPsE+aeteoC1px+/kVmee5LKKpJdo99 XbSXjZHIMgwfVSQfzpWabrv+SiwkRjygTrHk0tAXNsuRhPWTpg69xfVIQCQG0Da/ m/CiayXJRWCD2TAfoDecyffvkT8+NQEJ2Z1ow7EGDcvisVY+PtgZ2fJHNWdu9a+z /+87l6zOjvBlPRR2JBKv4HGSW72NeJTeMP+4jAn4zXZ+Ks7Oj9E+LaXgCKvfBLih VLYR1NOR+JP3qn3fQNsx8bFLFfRzjs0nEGl7c0C1z/xD2Lw843n+kx4UbdHO8lTd dhWyJvl+wCfiGbVnMMjgJLGj4LtVCcFoGgImQyekAVZnO3Vr3pGQXVmM3/wBerE2 feVSJaZkI5En5cgha8RG5Z+uy5/UOja8nAoiPxR7BuqvsnMW/Nk6utwiSOiqHJNp ilU2vg85eWRg9PcTbx5t/lFs7utVB3a5kfplR8OTjPAeNXL6wg0= =RzAz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--