From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: mediatek: convert from clk round_rate() to determine_rate()
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 11:49:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9531607.CDJkKcVGEf@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106-clk-pmdomain-mediatek-round-rate-v1-1-49441ea27f84@redhat.com>
On Friday, 7 November 2025 00:40:43 Central European Standard Time Brian Masney wrote:
> The round_rate() clk ops is deprecated in the clk framework in favor
> of the determine_rate() clk ops, so let's convert this driver so that
> round_rate() can be removed from the clk core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-mfg-pmdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-mfg-pmdomain.c b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-mfg-pmdomain.c
> index af20111067c02a5f9a0d6d751e9e0dc32c1a4d90..9bad577b3ae4bf1b83d4f782bb52f56f779a8974 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-mfg-pmdomain.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/mediatek/mtk-mfg-pmdomain.c
> @@ -309,11 +309,11 @@ static unsigned long mtk_mfg_recalc_rate_gpu(struct clk_hw *hw,
> return readl(mfg->shared_mem + GF_REG_FREQ_OUT_GPU) * HZ_PER_KHZ;
> }
>
> -static long mtk_mfg_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> - unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +static int mtk_mfg_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> {
> /*
> - * The round_rate callback needs to be implemented to avoid returning
> + * The determine_rate callback needs to be implemented to avoid returning
> * the current clock frequency, rather than something even remotely
> * close to the frequency that was asked for.
> *
> @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static long mtk_mfg_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> * high current frequency, breaking the powersave governor in the process.
> */
>
> - return rate;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static unsigned long mtk_mfg_recalc_rate_stack(struct clk_hw *hw,
> @@ -338,12 +338,12 @@ static unsigned long mtk_mfg_recalc_rate_stack(struct clk_hw *hw,
>
> static const struct clk_ops mtk_mfg_clk_gpu_ops = {
> .recalc_rate = mtk_mfg_recalc_rate_gpu,
> - .round_rate = mtk_mfg_round_rate,
> + .determine_rate = mtk_mfg_determine_rate,
> };
>
> static const struct clk_ops mtk_mfg_clk_stack_ops = {
> .recalc_rate = mtk_mfg_recalc_rate_stack,
> - .round_rate = mtk_mfg_round_rate,
> + .determine_rate = mtk_mfg_determine_rate,
> };
>
> static const struct clk_init_data mtk_mfg_clk_gpu_init = {
>
> ---
> base-commit: df5d79720b152e7ff058f11ed7e88d5b5c8d2a0c
> change-id: 20251106-clk-pmdomain-mediatek-round-rate-649a9bf7d30a
>
> Best regards,
>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
I didn't test boot this, but it should be fine, as I've checked
and all the places where the clk core checks for round_rate, it
also checks for determine_rate. So this is likely correct.
I've also made sure the adjusted op implementation is correct,
in that simply returning 0 leaves the requested rate as-is and
preserves the existing behaviour.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 23:40 [PATCH] pmdomain: mediatek: convert from clk round_rate() to determine_rate() Brian Masney
2025-11-10 10:49 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2025-11-10 12:23 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9531607.CDJkKcVGEf@workhorse \
--to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).