Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: walter.chang@mediatek.com,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
	Chun-hung.Wu@mediatek.com, Freddy.Hsin@mediatek.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-mediatek: Make timer-mediatek become loadable module
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:23:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96d6f405-22bc-f112-2c88-76da280eed46@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ac030be-8b5e-d190-6676-8cea9cdc1915@collabora.com>



On 16/02/2023 11:22, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 15/02/23 15:46, Sudeep Holla ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 02:30:51PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>
>>> Both. I mean that these platforms do have architected timers, but they are 
>>> stopped
>>> before the bootloader jumps to the kernel, or they are never started at all.
>>>
>>> Please refer to:
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/clocksource/timer-mediatek.c?h=next-20230215&id=327e93cf9a59b0d04eb3a31a7fdbf0f11cf13ecb
>>>
>>> For a nice explanation.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for that. Well then I see no point in making these modules if you
>> can't have generic Image that boots on all the platform. I now tend to think
>> that these are made modules just because GKI demands and it *might* work
>> on one or 2 platforms. One we move this as modules, how will be know the
>> Image without these timers or with them built as modules will boot or not
>> on a given mediatek platform. Sorry, I initially saw some point in making
>> these timers as modules but if they are required for boot on some systems
>> then I see no point. So if that is the case, NACK for these as it just
>> creates more confusion after these are merged as why some Images or
>> even why defconfig image(if we push the config change as well) is not
>> booting on these platforms.
>>
>> It is no longer just for system timer useful in low power CPU idle states
>> as I initial thought.
>>
> 
> I think that there is still a point in modularization for this driver and I
> can propose a rather simple solution, even though this may add some, rather
> little, code duplication to the mix.
> 
> The platforms that I've described (like mt6795) need the system timer to be
> initialized as early as possible - that's true - but that timer is always
> "CPUXGPT".
> 
> On those platforms, you *still* have multiple timers:
>   - CPUX (short for cpuxgpt), used only as system timer;
>   - SYST, as another system timer implementation (additional timers) but
>     those are always initialized (AFAIK) from the bootloader before booting;
>   - GPT (General Purpose Timer).
> 
> On one SoC, you may have:
>   - CPUX *and* SYST
>   - CPUX *and* GPT
>   - CPUX *and* SYST *and* GPT
> 
> ... where the only one that is boot critical and needs to be initialized early
> is always only CPUX.
> 
> Hence this proposal: to still allow modularization of timers on MediaTek platforms,
> we could eventually split the CPUX as a separated driver that *cannot be*, due to
> the previously explained constraints, compiled as module, hence always built-in,
> from a timer-mediatek driver that could be a module and capable of handling only
> SYST and GPT timers.
> 
> In that case, we'd hence have...
>   - timer-mediatek-cpux.o (bool)
>   - timer-mediatek.c (tristate)
> 
> Counting that the CPUX timers are actually even using different `tick_resume`
> and `set_state_shutdown` callbacks (doing only a IRQ clear/restore and nothing
> else), the amount of duplication would be .. well, again, minimal, but then
> this means that timer-mediatek-cpux would be `default y if ARCH_MEDIATEK`, or
> even selected by ARCH_MEDIATEK itself.
> 
> If you think that this could be a good solution, I can send a "fast" patch to
> split it out, preparing the ground for the people doing this module work.
> 
> Any considerations?
> 

I think your proposal sounds acceptable, but we would need to make sure that all 
SoCs can boot with the CPUX driver. I'm aware of some armv7 SoCs that use a kind 
of hack to enable the architecture timer [1]. This, for one part, should be 
moved to CPUX, if possible. For the other part it makes me wonder if really all 
supported MediaTek platforms will boot with SYST/GPT being a module. I think we 
will need some effort from the community to test that.

So as a resume, yes I think your approach is feasible but we should collect 
tested-by tags before merging it.

Regards,
Matthias


[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/mediatek.c?h=v6.2-rc8#n16


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-16 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14 10:53 [PATCH v2 0/4] Support timer drivers as loadable modules walter.chang
2023-02-14 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] time/sched_clock: Export sched_clock_register() walter.chang
2023-02-14 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] clocksource/drivers/mmio: Export clocksource_mmio_init() walter.chang
2023-02-14 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-of: Remove __init markings walter.chang
2023-02-14 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-mediatek: Make timer-mediatek become loadable module walter.chang
2023-02-14 11:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-14 23:20     ` John Stultz
2023-02-15 18:35       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-15 20:59         ` John Stultz
2023-02-14 22:20   ` Sudeep Holla
2023-02-15 12:43     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-02-15 13:18       ` Sudeep Holla
2023-02-15 13:30         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-02-15 14:46           ` Sudeep Holla
2023-02-16  1:03             ` John Stultz
2023-02-16 10:22             ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-02-16 11:23               ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2023-02-16 11:36                 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-03-29  6:22                   ` Walter Chang (張維哲)
2023-04-10  6:58                     ` Walter Chang (張維哲)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96d6f405-22bc-f112-2c88-76da280eed46@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=Chun-hung.Wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Freddy.Hsin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walter.chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox