Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] dt-bindings: mailbox: Add mboxes property for CMDQ secure driver

["Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)" <Jason-JH.Lin@mediatek.com>]

Hi Conor,

Thanks for the reviews.

On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 16:46 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 06:25:54PM +0800, Shawn Sung wrote:
> > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Add mboxes to define a GCE loopping thread as a secure irq handler.
> > This property is only required if CMDQ secure driver is supported.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hsiao Chien Sung <shawn.sung@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml         | 10
> > ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-
> > mailbox.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-
> > mailbox.yaml
> > index cef9d76013985..c0d80cc770899 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-
> > mailbox.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-
> > mailbox.yaml
> > @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ properties:
> >      items:
> >        - const: gce
> >  
> > +  mediatek,gce-events:
> > +    description:
> > +      The event id which is mapping to the specific hardware event
> > signal
> > +      to gce. The event id is defined in the gce header
> > +      include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h of each chips.
> 
> Missing any info here about when this should be used, hint - you have
> it
> in the commit message.
> 
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-arrayi
> 
> Why is the ID used by the CMDQ service not fixed for each SoC?
> 
I forgot to sync with Shawn about this:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240124011459.12204-1-jason-
jh.lin@mediatek.com

I'll fix it at the next version.

Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin

> Cheers,
> Conor