From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D146AC2BBCA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:51:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject :MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Le171/VeGpvm1hmSQylabsEhDXhqvr8P7tidIDMliq4=; b=nCoX324NXgDw5f DKh1I6Y23lFNPJ/K9fp88iIDOfrKVobTmu+2aLi1YfQnJ2EddbgrOszldxFHF6WmKNY5cQWkkLcaw O8NENBqU4hLHpSrWEC27uNp+qVROj06jrQvobMTfgxAT5RPNf+93krj84KBsQfXstOUTj/tEUqQ9W Grht9Q9TQtDYmkyysiL/EYd9Ui5dP8Ol9c4XzUclAYyO8+0j1r01vfGpRMrxL4VDIyyCeTeLlbmzc 2PgzMtMWvKoyKIvOEcnCCYL8sA/2EFJdKKDW/4qdUse0Ip4ke+zSyfCuaxq3DYRwcaVoFjmrn1W46 RDBH5bvV1dKqp8RM67uw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM1tt-00000002B5C-20Gl; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:51:41 +0000 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com ([2a00:1098:ed:100::25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM1tm-00000002B40-217S; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:51:36 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1719305492; bh=J7W6jQQOq6oMCiMWpafdMRKX7RlHQIMkt8NcZBcjKOk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=S2JST7Gtm+r4PcCve+QDN4GXwgH8RYiAG870eilIPav2n3x4SlVt+Lm1R+3ADFdTb iSOhePfe6weu4x/WNfuo8HTjZA7EeP9PMNW9IGckoUJRWp+jksOOHjfmxD+raBBPi9 MaEhWi5sXVg+XKrtY5rPBKlkPPx43SSP5rx1xBvte8IjgZvBoo+5gk31oQol8rBhyq lgjc6Em6c+7ARiHDEUxwSRtwk/3DFxJgikGbpaj9hb/XHBchFMCKRmZ7E/Orp6Y/y4 R94oswSbt3e8dBu7W5ybEe+Eq09WnWs5TRrlKHOFhQ/IUV35i82dPGiPza0aMJkBHr /9pH1mbAdHrzw== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6353378045F; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <9c498e37-df8b-469e-818a-9b1c9f2b1a3c@collabora.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:51:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: fix switch probe on bananapi-r64 To: Linux regressions mailing list , Paolo Abeni References: <20240516204847.171029-1-linux@fw-web.de> <5AEE5668-0C8E-4EE4-A398-66CB99DF5650@public-files.de> <43aacd9d-b851-4100-8ccc-878ac6ae10f8@leemhuis.info> <698cf562-1ca9-4aa3-be7e-a1474b612c5b@leemhuis.info> <0cba095c-3d55-416a-a7ad-b359129731cf@arinc9.com> <714da201-654b-4183-8e5e-8ff0b64fe621@leemhuis.info> <2cac4cf68304e81abffbd9ff0387ee100323c2b7.camel@redhat.com> <1807a142-1534-4fa4-ad4b-d1c03af014c2@arinc9.com> <58d8ddea-71cc-427a-94cc-a95f6bce61d2@collabora.com> <16e9c06e-9908-455d-a387-614fefe5bcf8@arinc9.com> <5e87d31c-b059-4f9a-93f7-dc87465ed14a@collabora.com> <4416ef22-78cc-4ce5-b61d-69ff0903811e@arinc9.com> <750a60a6-4585-4bd2-97be-cf944e51fbdb@leemhuis.info> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <750a60a6-4585-4bd2-97be-cf944e51fbdb@leemhuis.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240625_015134_748174_E16457DD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Golle , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Wunderlich , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Il 25/06/24 07:56, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) ha scritto: > On 17.06.24 13:08, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >> On 17/06/2024 11:33, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> [...] >> I've submitted a patch series that fixes the regression. Angelo argued >> against the way the regression is fixed. I've very clearly argued back why >> I find Angelo's approach wrong. There's been no response back. I don't >> understand why reverting the patch is the likely outcome > > Long story short: because that how things like that are handled in the > Linux kernel project, as Linus wants it like that. See some of the > quotes from https://docs.kernel.org/process/handling-regressions.html > for details. > >> whilst the >> standing argument points towards applying the said patch series. If a >> revert happens before this discussion with Angelo finalises, this will set >> a precedent that will tell maintainers that they can have their way by just >> not replying to the ongoing discussions. >> >> That said, the decision of resolving the regression by either reverting the >> patch or applying the patch series shall not depend on whether or not >> Angelo is pleased but rather there're no counter-arguments left on the >> points brought, meaning the decision shall be made depending on the >> argument that stands. >> >> Therefore, I suggest that unless Angelo responds back with a >> counter-argument in the window of a week or two, as you've described, my >> patch series shall be applied. > > It looks more and more like we are stuck here (or was there progress and > I just missed it?) while the 6.10 final is slowly getting closer. Hence: > > AngeloGioacchino, should we ask the net maintainers to revert > 868ff5f4944aa9 ("net: dsa: mt7530-mdio: read PHY address of switch from > device tree") for now to resolve this regression? Reminder, there is > nothing wrong with that commit per se afaik, it just exposes a problem > that needs to be fixed first before it can be reapplied. > To be clear on this: I asked for the commit to be fixed such that it guarantees backwards compatibility with older device trees. If no fix comes, then I guess that we should ask them to revert this commit until a fix is available. I don't like this situation, either, btw. Ciao! Angelo > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > -- > Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: > https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr > If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. > > #regzbot poke