From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <robdclark@gmail.com>,
<dwmw2@infradead.org>, <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<yong.wu@mediatek.com>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<orsonzhai@gmail.com>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
<zhang.lyra@gmail.com>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
<jean-philippe@linaro.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
<yangyingliang@huawei.com>, <quic_saipraka@quicinc.com>,
<jon@solid-run.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] iommu: Use EINVAL for incompatible device/domain in ->attach_dev
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:14:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2mfaG1/6hd1qykW@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107152645.GD21002@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 03:26:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index ba47c73f5b8c..01fd7df16cb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -2430,23 +2430,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> > goto out_unlock;
> > }
> > } else if (smmu_domain->smmu != smmu) {
> > - dev_err(dev,
> > - "cannot attach to SMMU %s (upstream of %s)\n",
> > - dev_name(smmu_domain->smmu->dev),
> > - dev_name(smmu->dev));
> > - ret = -ENXIO;
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > goto out_unlock;
> > } else if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1 &&
> > master->ssid_bits != smmu_domain->s1_cfg.s1cdmax) {
> > - dev_err(dev,
> > - "cannot attach to incompatible domain (%u SSID bits != %u)\n",
> > - smmu_domain->s1_cfg.s1cdmax, master->ssid_bits);
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > goto out_unlock;
> > } else if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1 &&
> > smmu_domain->stall_enabled != master->stall_enabled) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to stall-%s domain\n",
> > - smmu_domain->stall_enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > goto out_unlock;
> > }
> I think it would be helpful to preserve these messages using
> dev_err_ratelimited() so that attach failure can be diagnosed without
> having to hack the messages back into the driver.
Thank you for the review.
The change is already picked up last week. Yet, I can add prints
back with a followup patch, if no one has a problem with that.
Also, I am not quite sure what the use case would be to have an
error print. Perhaps dev_dbg() would be more fitting if it is
just for diagnosis?
Thanks
Nic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 23:00 [PATCH v7 0/5] Define EINVAL as device/domain incompatibility Nicolin Chen
2022-10-17 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] iommu: Add return value rules to attach_dev op and APIs Nicolin Chen
2022-10-18 1:20 ` Baolu Lu
2022-10-17 23:02 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu: Regulate EINVAL in ->attach_dev callback functions Nicolin Chen
2022-10-17 23:02 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] iommu: Use EINVAL for incompatible device/domain in ->attach_dev Nicolin Chen
2022-11-07 15:26 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-08 0:14 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2022-11-08 13:20 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-08 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-17 23:02 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] iommu: Propagate return value in ->attach_dev callback functions Nicolin Chen
2022-10-17 23:54 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Define EINVAL as device/domain incompatibility Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2mfaG1/6hd1qykW@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jon@solid-run.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_saipraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).