From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328C6E75457 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:45:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To :Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jEYO2NkrxQsO6qQsxm8aU+R8LGjZWuGj1ySjbOKj8VI=; b=V9N35wprddHm13LsVW3lk8MeU6 KLb1ltc7Oi0rMtCuqNHfS7B+VIguY7/ZA4/Bgrs+j4nCS9qQmWkt0K/0rciSNmclVpK8zfMk8uPiI j5EULYVg9Wuu4R4qLKvgmaSKJjy5rULmkcmPPwb/kk8fQKnsQxjWU3yJ9BuswwJ9otB8LTyLK2qn1 8vAaQ2wrRL9ig5vJLdFkmDNSuhcemamBgE8501ifKp7zJiDomO6FR9uxJSj0KMX5rAb3HDlORZZB6 H4t51wBaWkAm2qpySQigJ4N2896lVRCQIXPZ5UHHVfdbwdFoE26qDnwEKKEBraELeNmRyeLdtQBns /WrrYVkA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qnem2-00EdcH-0E; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 12:45:14 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qnelx-00EdbK-2x; Tue, 03 Oct 2023 12:45:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287BE611EC; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81FD9C433C7; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:45:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696337108; bh=RJXkdGT/Nhkeb2GuoSRT2fL7sCAwLnQPGvr69EUBjvI=; h=Date:From:To:List-Id:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pargP6MBcbO0eqbPYlG8SeUTvjfHoYjB1luHQfdbgcsf8F6ZbM8E4RQBJr98P7G+G UQ+mBqa252CJuexEOSRcyLexoRoN21yqSDH5IY2UsrAdvyhuRaxLXWj2DKKcVasL4K NaPu5ULcg/sSpMng2GlFSyQBnNuDnC5bRUzzQTigJ6OB6jzrKS58DWez8fMryIBxpw 5c61WelMqR7e/Kq3TRc9rDkh1gg0wdaDa0IrdMZO/9IcdPHCcx1gv91H97ggSV++u8 bTMMMpobvBosOOIkFuOHxB3fl2VFzKK9v00YhbNjQwgVn6SNlsBi8W5DUv4w1oICaM jCLh7o2qwGMEw== Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 08:45:07 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] MediaTek: Update MAINTAINERS and dts fixes for v6.7 Message-ID: References: <20231003-mediatek-fixes-v6-7-v1-0-dad7cd62a8ff@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231003-mediatek-fixes-v6-7-v1-0-dad7cd62a8ff@collabora.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231003_054509_997969_59E89914 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.99 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=EDcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E?= Prado , Seiya Wang , Sam Shih , Tinghan Shen , Eugen Hristev , soc@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chunfeng Yun , Fabien Parent , Miles Chen , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Macpaul Lin , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jieyy Yang Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:13:42PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >Hello SoC maintainers, > >As suggested by Arnd in [1], I am sending an update to the MAINTAINERS >file, adding myself to the MediaTek SoC maintainers, and some urgent >bugfixes for MediaTek devicetrees. Just curious: if it's urgent, and there are patches cc'ed to stable, why wait for 6.7 rather than one of the 6.6 -rc cycles? -- Thanks, Sasha