From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040D3CA0ED3 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:36:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Y4KivTlLQsrs8/eog2KE5IYE9wwB2vaE2IV6Oyt+Eno=; b=3NQm6JgXAyereQu5qU3WJ+niz4 FUyZGMoBESx7sV83RpdPJ6xpFSWwZs1T+m1+O9H4fmODMAglBaae1Xp8aL3RZwOZ98ENCkqY3c9Iq CplzcxksSEe0DKqmMzOfzZOpcd796IdmUjtBHRN52O+7Dm5faz4NYdPT+yUVk+Fhpzn7EEd6NXCOe ldptaHQgrMT+HvWH0KkvXVeWvtoVvXiAKJWoJ8Hh8Qo1gZ+15OFB2Qjh/9Dd9FxvVDnLbsFJIuBZj LOO3XxsJW423ToY/Gbtr4X0N+sZmBBmlOF3wpiqL75ah/Ev0xtLjWxD4F3mkvE2cGNhEeyEntF6Ui UrxjZtWA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1slnN3-00000003xD1-1Uhy; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 10:36:17 +0000 Received: from nyc.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:45d1:ec00::3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1slmw9-00000003puY-259u; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 10:08:31 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by nyc.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C973A43725; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08F95C4CEC2; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:08:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725444508; bh=h+ZEYfjn015chexkmjVF91yXTddj8EqTDzVXa7vLvQs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JHfyKHB0HJBsFEZlL7NjNCB5ddfJxum5SE+uGVyWPlj7ImOuEjAJWhQ19kXHj86O/ JUSehN6SDX/w+BTnao+5DetDK0qdy6ycr2ZvoN9Hgw5dn9YwpS8aqGPdOZ6Q3NW4bO 4G47XVjyBuKsE32/ICXRP112G7vJLvzvXHF7B0QbGl0xqeprwT79ho3iBQa9gdteTK MVHIMvatmubJWC2FpyeQnix0sFd4KzBWc6dl/DAmNPhg3Nxonxs2Mu6ZAlinKvW8Pz WTYUz87+WIGyVhzpsYUxs2ilKDSFTELafqe+ckjorc+6gFxR6wGxgdqcfBDmVuh4cz AF3GBajLF7CGQ== Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 10:08:22 +0000 From: Tzung-Bi Shih To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Wolfram Sang , Benson Leung , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , Johan Hovold , Jiri Kosina , Andy Shevchenko , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/12] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Message-ID: References: <20240904090016.2841572-1-wenst@chromium.org> <20240904090016.2841572-12-wenst@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240904090016.2841572-12-wenst@chromium.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240904_030829_616359_F388055F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:00:13PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_of_hw_prober.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_of_hw_prober.c [...] > +static int chromeos_of_hw_prober_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hw_prober_platforms); i++) { > + int ret; > + > + if (!of_machine_is_compatible(hw_prober_platforms[i].compatible)) > + continue; > + > + ret = hw_prober_platforms[i].prober(&pdev->dev, hw_prober_platforms[i].data); > + /* Ignore unrecoverable errors and keep going through other probers */ > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + return ret; Is it harmless if some of the components get probed multiple times? E.g.: comp1 probed -> comp2 probed -> comp3 returned -EPROBE_DEFER -> some time later, chromeos_of_hw_prober_probe() gets called again.