From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:16:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwfvuA2WhD_0P3gL@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008073430.3992087-5-wenst@chromium.org>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:34:23PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having
> multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often
> connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals
> and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display
> panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on
> laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device
> can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that
> information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each
> device.
>
> This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The
> current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device
> tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe
> function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction
> of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared"
> resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same
> time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include
> moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or
> pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and
> requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen
> on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based
> Lenovo Thinkpad 13S.
>
> Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks,
> this change introduces a simple I2C component probe function. For a
> given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of
> them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds.
> It will then enable the device that responds.
>
> This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The
> status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set
> to "fail-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is
> needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device
> drivers running at the same time.
Fresh reading of the commit message make me think why the firmware or
bootloader on such a device can't form a dynamic OF (overlay?) to fulfill
the need?
Another question is that we have the autoprobing mechanism for I2C for ages,
why that one can't be (re-)used / extended to cover these cases?
...
> +#ifndef _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H
> +#define _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H
Missing kconfig.h.
> +struct device;
> +struct device_node;
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_of_probe_ops - I2C OF component prober callbacks
> + *
> + * A set of callbacks to be used by i2c_of_probe_component().
> + *
> + * All callbacks are optional. Callbacks are called only once per run, and are
> + * used in the order they are defined in this structure.
> + *
> + * All callbacks that have return values shall return %0 on success,
> + * or a negative error number on failure.
> + *
> + * The @dev parameter passed to the callbacks is the same as @dev passed to
> + * i2c_of_probe_component(). It should only be used for dev_printk() calls
> + * and nothing else, especially not managed device resource (devres) APIs.
> + */
> +struct i2c_of_probe_ops {
> + /**
> + * @enable: Retrieve and enable resources so that the components respond to probes.
> + *
> + * Resources should be reverted to their initial state before returning if this fails.
> + */
> + int (*enable)(struct device *dev, struct device_node *bus_node, void *data);
> +
> + /**
> + * @cleanup_early: Release exclusive resources prior to enabling component.
> + *
> + * Only called if a matching component is actually found. If none are found,
> + * resources that would have been released in this callback should be released in
> + * @free_resourcs_late instead.
> + */
> + void (*cleanup_early)(struct device *dev, void *data);
> +
> + /**
> + * @cleanup: Opposite of @enable to balance refcounts and free resources after probing.
> + *
> + * Should check if resources were already freed by @cleanup_early.
> + */
> + void (*cleanup)(struct device *dev, void *data);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i2c_of_probe_cfg - I2C OF component prober configuration
> + * @ops: Callbacks for the prober to use.
> + * @type: A string to match the device node name prefix to probe for.
> + */
> +struct i2c_of_probe_cfg {
> + const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> + const char *type;
> +};
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC)
> +
> +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx);
> +
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) */
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_I2C_OF_PROBER_H */
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 7:34 [PATCH v8 0/8] platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] of: base: Add for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix() Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] i2c: core: Remove extra space in Makefile Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-08 8:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] i2c: Introduce OF component probe function Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-10 15:16 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2024-10-14 3:53 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-14 11:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 5:22 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 17:58 ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-15 18:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-16 7:01 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-16 9:28 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-16 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] i2c: of-prober: Add simple helpers for regulator support Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 17:58 ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-15 18:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-16 7:39 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] i2c: of-prober: Add GPIO support to simple helpers Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-10 15:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-14 4:06 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-14 11:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 5:31 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 11:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 12:05 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 5:34 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 11:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 17:58 ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-16 7:49 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-16 15:34 ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] platform/chrome: Introduce device tree hardware prober Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-10 15:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-10 15:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-14 4:56 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-14 11:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 6:32 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 11:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 12:18 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 12:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-14 7:04 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-14 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-10-15 7:51 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-10-15 17:59 ` Doug Anderson
2024-10-08 7:34 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173-elm-hana: Mark touchscreens and trackpads as fail Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwfvuA2WhD_0P3gL@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).