From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, jgg@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
robdclark@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, yong.wu@mediatek.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
yangyingliang@huawei.com, quic_saipraka@quicinc.com,
jon@solid-run.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] iommu: Add return value rules to attach_dev op and APIs
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:20:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7c55d04-2523-e6d5-8715-0f8a6d3e3233@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd56d93c18621104a0fa1b0de31e9b760b81b769.1666042872.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On 2022/10/18 7:01, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Cases like VFIO wish to attach a device to an existing domain that was
> not allocated specifically from the device. This raises a condition
> where the IOMMU driver can fail the domain attach because the domain and
> device are incompatible with each other.
>
> This is a soft failure that can be resolved by using a different domain.
>
> Provide a dedicated errno EINVAL from the IOMMU driver during attach that
> the reason why the attach failed is because of domain incompatibility.
>
> VFIO can use this to know that the attach is a soft failure and it should
> continue searching. Otherwise, the attach will be a hard failure and VFIO
> will return the code to userspace.
>
> Update kdocs to add rules of return value to the attach_dev op and APIs.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/iommu.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 4893c2429ca5..3c0c5d64bb50 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1949,6 +1949,18 @@ static int __iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * iommu_attach_device - Attach an IOMMU domain to a device
> + * @domain: IOMMU domain to attach
> + * @dev: Device that will be attached
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success and error code on failure
> + *
> + * Note that EINVAL can be treated as a soft failure, indicating
> + * that certain configuration of the domain is incompatible with
> + * the device. In this case attaching a different domain to the
> + * device may succeed.
> + */
> int iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iommu_group *group;
> @@ -2075,6 +2087,18 @@ static int __iommu_attach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * iommu_attach_group - Attach an IOMMU domain to an IOMMU group
> + * @domain: IOMMU domain to attach
> + * @group: IOMMU group that will be attached
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success and error code on failure
> + *
> + * Note that EINVAL can be treated as a soft failure, indicating
> + * that certain configuration of the domain is incompatible with
> + * the group. In this case attaching a different domain to the
> + * group may succeed.
> + */
> int iommu_attach_group(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_group *group)
> {
> int ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index a325532aeab5..6f3569340e8a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,18 @@ struct iommu_ops {
> /**
> * struct iommu_domain_ops - domain specific operations
> * @attach_dev: attach an iommu domain to a device
> + * Return:
> + * * 0 - success
> + * * EINVAL - can indicate that device and domain are incompatible due to
> + * some previous configuration of the domain, in which case the
> + * driver shouldn't log an error, since it is legitimate for a
> + * caller to test reuse of existing domains. Otherwise, it may
> + * still represent some other fundamental problem
> + * * ENOMEM - out of memory
> + * * ENOSPC - non-ENOMEM type of resource allocation failures
> + * * EBUSY - device is attached to a domain and cannot be changed
> + * * ENODEV - device specific errors, not able to be attached
> + * * <others> - treated as ENODEV by the caller. Use is discouraged
> * @detach_dev: detach an iommu domain from a device
> * @map: map a physically contiguous memory region to an iommu domain
> * @map_pages: map a physically contiguous set of pages of the same size to
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 23:00 [PATCH v7 0/5] Define EINVAL as device/domain incompatibility Nicolin Chen
2022-10-17 23:01 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] iommu: Add return value rules to attach_dev op and APIs Nicolin Chen
2022-10-18 1:20 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2022-10-17 23:02 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] iommu: Regulate EINVAL in ->attach_dev callback functions Nicolin Chen
2022-10-17 23:02 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] iommu: Use EINVAL for incompatible device/domain in ->attach_dev Nicolin Chen
2022-11-07 15:26 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-08 0:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-08 13:20 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-08 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-17 23:02 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] iommu: Propagate return value in ->attach_dev callback functions Nicolin Chen
2022-10-17 23:54 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Define EINVAL as device/domain incompatibility Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7c55d04-2523-e6d5-8715-0f8a6d3e3233@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jon@solid-run.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_saipraka@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).