From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62451CA1010 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 21:42:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8vy67ObTbkZdZhbIeej3G7oE3M7Losn79kkcFsXwKCg=; b=xTV7XkqKyh+XyfQvrsabVmG3CF Uiu1x0gUWERZIQjrK+cFIyVKA0HQMoVmh2lOMnbcok6qQo4FafPAcGhR1qO3DEi/RpzUE/r+FJAHr y/aTrBmXeIdttUjAiN+lO2m//3O7We1HYSmTV4lWkNpetH8EDVnrprg286fPOj0u38lwi38tQh70V tVQGA3PS33Vt6gWdIlwFPd/I5lh4WWo/9cYH+5lHc6gykUSy9obmU6Qumm6U4JQMJ2ZkGvnF3JX1E h3JeUkgtuUdFHPEYCPFDZowLjG+9kx0oyi9Hq8/h4qJmpT53g+bypI3YkHhRp9Ai4ayJCSJbYLDl5 yax2E47w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1utYmA-00000002Agj-1yXb; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 21:42:50 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.12]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1utS4N-00000000Nad-24rt; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:33:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756823591; x=1788359591; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=CqeygO38G2UqLYwyJWypxYe4AznIXuR38IzQgfyWO78=; b=R+NOi+nJrarhs80YhsVfWzBjLjNOh1LR+BDIiUxqfFYOimx7IRISA52F e1tpSpQcfj7/pR/gk6PzacsO2gLM7J5vM4kcwcZzRFRWOCpXX/YOxBJCe IagZlfxytlGfste3qJOvso0JPtFNFMnX5kW6tJOgxGo5k5FfpU/uAIP1p y32SUjuI5fkNZhbKKwPBr88owZIhURVJnijlUyc3soXbz8++L7SvMpYyv d4wFxdequ/Mh+vF3+uCgRowN4z6lLGiRQivs74MyPB8npz4N+UPFq01W9 DfnlZIP9wRWFbvBOGYrEVtR3tX029JZHAcwQcA4dKgwmozC0nshns5ft0 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Kn23gWXFRP+qedQy3N/9Wg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jzXLv+1nTNCHTkmRou/95Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11541"; a="70529031" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,230,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="70529031" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2025 07:33:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: t6YdkPslS0eCpPn1gsG2vA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2hQHF1LATnKCD8YNAvpqBg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Sep 2025 07:33:01 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1utS49-0000000AiVG-092e; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 17:32:57 +0300 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 17:32:56 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Alexey Klimov , Lorenzo Bianconi , Sean Wang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Paul Cercueil , Kees Cook , Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Dong Aisheng , Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , Jacky Bai , Pengutronix Kernel Team , NXP S32 Linux Team , Sascha Hauer , Tony Lindgren , Haojian Zhuang , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Neil Armstrong , Mark Brown , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , Konrad Dybcio Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 15/16] pinctrl: qcom: mark the `gpio` and `egpio` pins function as non-strict functions Message-ID: References: <20250902-pinctrl-gpio-pinfuncs-v7-0-bb091daedc52@linaro.org> <20250902-pinctrl-gpio-pinfuncs-v7-15-bb091daedc52@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250902-pinctrl-gpio-pinfuncs-v7-15-bb091daedc52@linaro.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250902_073311_579500_A777E35E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Allow pins muxed to the "gpio" or "egpio" function to be requested as > GPIOs even if pinmux_ops say the controller should be strict. Why? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko