From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBBE1105F7BC for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:25:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=QN552TZqrouE4+tCPS0mMoQgQIkZUkN7DTnt9deeNgM=; b=pHii39O+8zGnSO+KJgvOWNAdkL VnHj6RxvcTAWNqeU/kQgO+UIGjPEK3jVepLsfyX/jDnVhOYZlgqzFMUsMG6Viz9fjdYjPB7gpzn8I z4bCG2vlQAFrSTNuE1poLRSdj+v7iOovl1/ympfXh53QUE++l6dOsiLAjAdX/Nfzccv9vg5D7tC2M e0vuGt8+LKaM5a81QBnH5xpW+U7n4R5ACSnNqIJCfoXTww9vLRXwRp4p5JKsCKDyiEWJc23Ms09Tu X22eidrDToXm9RXlpbhGcWNQ5fnhhbtku/ndP5PnzcKWBi4sH/h5IjALdeM0DwdcH369ViPtdMN7h SO6+P6Mg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w14Ob-00000000Y41-1BbD; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:25:49 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w14OX-00000000Y2R-0ekq; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:25:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D811E6012B; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16977C19425; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773415542; bh=QN552TZqrouE4+tCPS0mMoQgQIkZUkN7DTnt9deeNgM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Fv+rSfGYabwP29m0niuzYlLhX9bOxuPNCmBYvMs+Ek1Dz3+5ljQy9LX0Cd2Dsx6As Q1OaGBzr6TzuiTRXxmFZHiXnz79grkRBVLyFXAeOnsHZO8frG+9i3VYFaTTpICT2Ar AtYKENf4NqVPykJDonzFGRhX2TD5cMBF1Og7tUv5RPKq9TOkyJetHCps0o3AYetZs0 pV3DyvRCNjiRvL/ExWJbryBjn2OU6+ZmqPcRPAW3FhRp+v8+tjbSB5Y0x+NmTQJqTR cUMXJZdl5U+qAJDqjWPDxOtdUvurTS054bCgDfwMjYkRQWrMDwxY6RziW9bb2rkRad vtUc20nJA39oQ== Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 16:25:39 +0100 From: Lorenzo Bianconi To: Simon Horman Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: select QDMA block according LAN/WAN configuration Message-ID: References: <20260310-airoha-qdma-lan-wan-mode-v1-1-64ec74dea872@kernel.org> <20260312172430.GA1267298@kernel.org> <20260312172248.68742f98@kernel.org> <20260313143018.GD461701@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GSGfyO71opm8Yq0x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260313143018.GD461701@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --GSGfyO71opm8Yq0x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 12:35:16PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 22:14:36 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > > > Is this a bug fix? > > > > > If so, perhaps it is for net with a fixes tag. =20 > > > >=20 > > > > I guess we do not need to target net tree since airoha_eth driver c= urrently > > > > supports just the LAN interface via the MT7530 DSA switch connected= to GDM1 > > > > and there are no WAN interfaces officially supported (PCS/external = phy is not > > > > merged mainline yet, it is only available in OpenWrt). > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > And at any rate, could you add some description of the before and= after > > > > > behaviour? =20 > > > >=20 > > > > Theoretically, before this patch, GDM ports were equally distribute= d between > > > > QDMA0 and QDMA1 while this patch assigns LAN interfaces to QDMA0 an= d WAN > > > > interface to QDMA1. However, for the reason explained above, this c= hange is > > > > not currently visible to the user. > > >=20 > > > Please update the commit message. And please try harder to explain=20 > > > the patches, this happens a lot with your submissions.. > >=20 > > ack, fine. Sorry for not beeing very clear about this (and other > > patches), I will pay more attention in the future. > > Do you think we should target net-next or net for this patch? >=20 > Hi Lorenzo, >=20 > As per your explanation above it seems to me that there is > no user-visible change. And I assume that implies no bug manifests. >=20 > If so, net-next sounds right to me. ack, I will rework the commit log and repost to net-next. Regards, Lorenzo --GSGfyO71opm8Yq0x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTquNwa3Txd3rGGn7Y6cBh0uS2trAUCabQscwAKCRA6cBh0uS2t rCrfAQCuZd7o/lQVJ85m7ozENElbP9fJ7xRXRRkm8z78rsSGewEAt4L9X5zunMFy HP3y/+3pF9RbCTIWqcdw6i6Z4JT7yAA= =y/aX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GSGfyO71opm8Yq0x--