From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E71F8FA78 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:28:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8Al3yrm/3hSvEPA958SWnVaUgmCGPZw8rcFuTzB+JYE=; b=TJGyX0itrM8LXaJoMfZg+WS2FQ a1wrqmSVTCs87ethbQC84hODb2vFL+erx7FPL77uss1nDK+arpbugNJVO/0sIIwzC0SO92b/g2tuf KrjZLpUxTw4Hoe/H+Fic78wEsNE2btOjpalS0BtrwG+6fDxUrBYpQiOYIeqgkLvMXCUl8pdgUekte UiNwi7hQDJbsnLB/mfdoVHTBTrXjJQP1qBLBHGcwsgsiyzZGEEpDGAccwULwgkmLqsx1OnzBBu8b8 XWpdsrdrg43D+bswUpz25uvs5yCUDFdjkXFsPyDl2J5nqWxixffvVKMEcohGCzVhMERKDdCmj7/cM P6gl5Ubg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wFC5V-00000008jmu-3kdW; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:28:29 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wFC5T-00000008jmH-0Q80 for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:28:28 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48909558b3aso34152605e9.0 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20251104.gappssmtp.com; s=20251104; t=1776781705; x=1777386505; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8Al3yrm/3hSvEPA958SWnVaUgmCGPZw8rcFuTzB+JYE=; b=tNgzzclKXapJ4ArzdujuJfAhYa1Vx3IiC+vEl4nUI9VfYmLnapgdPNaTR0oFvgXhkQ QoRnaBE+n8B0f5thDZ37zwpCzxryyJLVe2UgmNglQznfsSXZDyQTY1YSHdp2z/8kxJR1 wSpKnqnxqMIP/X7llnCpd9tSyfEBUgZA7hm6lNX2cXgKlCcLsvaFrA4VUFMXtCCOOVBs +4vc6mLPE9k12jMHWjCK9O8FQ/DOhO3N8VUgT0P1Ff0KkbUoTKm/LRnrUHNgcMRmzN7Z JGsiU8y+n9Inh79fknZlA2SN1sH/lx6/t32Q/S/H1PndSjIzJc4Ar52wg7JtYqOuRwSz 7Slg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776781705; x=1777386505; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8Al3yrm/3hSvEPA958SWnVaUgmCGPZw8rcFuTzB+JYE=; b=le+jrLx+V5odq3YTo6XeEQksrlX/csHr/1lCsLUgEIs4SIV2tCBdcS6MtbPDJ5hwvk we1xeM5jcXPezVsR9gq9yxRHMDuze4xMUTvOYN6Lxn86l1NiNZzlDPscURLvAEaBvaey gQvlwKUANzpEwfNGFlTj4emJNg7fGmI01KD8ZjO5r9KUu/58HJyH1t4DZ1W9MukigP6r zokglATxA5TV7LnUJLF9X77Jz8pYcOMn4lxjZp9CJ/j4u5/kOquEe+hM+apWEna7gCVI a3LuFTziDBryuy4WRBTnALRcfaoZcnH3YIHBu9y4jJuMCYMFClb+DDfddsOFBP9bg7XG p0bQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+LkBFhoQ55X8DyuYV4gKq28RVOREAkYwKe0CDYrpDqSxUkM/OHfZeYe/86hxDzFSuRcyvBUsgJdpstpYo5LA==@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwObE0ewAR6ZAHPTA23a7BarRj0Y+lQZumz0b5z/oR1ccCB7kvh dQUZn0WZB6Zp7VJvar0NZsKN4q/r0V+o407WDZHAzqB01fjmOKVJjYyVaehTfEUucnM= X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiesofRhpUdOw3slYXpk1hGlB4HhI/jmx5KaxwE0z7tXezeSZpxIcCBd0M4+AVM7 jpPn2ZwkZ996kox6IiR/0aYQH+3ZESz5dvPWlxirhhG3WkS6xB9UtBEwEG6+5fehg/XIPksdexu vLQdWQIvGpHpHqxYNNhb5D+rqKygnhM8IEe20vKFg0hHRehapqztOvPQLhuZNCAA7Nz/lCMAGpo b4aqa+tVvXK1sykXD4IeOJfqDIrNiUgx23iev/F2fbQGfYbhzBSNF3c/SF2IGuGsGMCo2VmfDLQ ctWn3yIpTnVr4I85khGfOFEduczftSIAWgI0cWUrH/tEIhzT6hoeuIuk1zsUEeovJWhPJzbLQxi ekY0MgvUaWVuk/Vdc+ISG99MNBxuMt7QmLVfrnRgzuQ0zyRuDwhOuhnolvqEKJX1fRP14vL22Bf thXSFv6iiMv9Urezg/epJoAIL6i1IUIMHc8IuBdi8BuRBVw4mxJYWcVE245becmLEQ6MvOHA0PR m8YU3YpbVZYicdRn89TO7l0HQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:25c6:b0:43d:7a08:a5f8 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43fe3e0ae91mr28509500f8f.35.1776781704476; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:28:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (p200300f65f114e0838b25d7f2f2f49cd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:f6:5f11:4e08:38b2:5d7f:2f2f:49cd]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-43fe4e3a18csm42923276f8f.20.2026.04.21.07.28.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 16:28:22 +0200 From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= To: Johannes Berg , Ulf Hansson Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz , "Christian A. Ehrhardt" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Wolfram Sang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Ping-Ke Shih , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau , Lorenzo Bianconi , Ryder Lee , Shayne Chen , Sean Wang , Brian Norris , Francesco Dolcini , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] sdio: Add syntactic sugar to store a pointer in sdio_driver_id Message-ID: References: <2d6e902083d693cdbb15fc62c6bf92db34fc734a.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wkasyawrdb76jdw2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d6e902083d693cdbb15fc62c6bf92db34fc734a.camel@sipsolutions.net> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260421_072827_189354_F879DF78 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.62 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --wkasyawrdb76jdw2 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] sdio: Add syntactic sugar to store a pointer in sdio_driver_id MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello Johannes, On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 10:59:04AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2026-04-21 at 10:12 +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig (The Capable Hub) > wrote: > > >=20 > > > We only received 1-3 of the 6: > > >=20 > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=3D1082520 > > >=20 > > > Or is this on purpose, and we should consider the set complete? > >=20 > > The remaining patches are for wifi. My expectation was that they go in > > via wifi+netdev once the first patch is in their base. But of course I'm > > open for maintainer coordination to let the series go in in less steps > > than I expected. If that helps I can also create an immutable branch, > > but I have no urge here, so if only the first patch goes in during the > > next merge window, I won't have problems to keep track of the remaining > > bits. >=20 > It's probably better for everything all around, including the various > automations that test patch series, if you just flip a coin, send these > to either BT or WiFi, and then resend the others later :) The first patch of this series adapting sdio_device_id is technically mmc material. However to demonstrate the upside of this patch you also have to look at at least one of bluetooth and wifi. So even if I drop one of those there are still two subsystems involved. And then in my subjective view it doesn't matter much if I involve two or three subsystems. Regarding test automations I would assume that if the bluetooth bot sees patches #1-#4 of this series it can do something already (involving either testing the series only partially or finding all 6 patches on lore). And then this isn't worse than just sending the first four patches of the series and delaying wifi until later. But I agree that's a trade-off. Having said that, I'm happy if the first patch is merged and patches #2 to #6 are discarded by the bluetooth and wifi people. I'll come back to them once the first patch is in a release. > All assuming we get an ACK from whoever is responsible for patch 1 to > merge it through some other tree :) To make this more explicit: That would be Ulf as MMC maintainer. Best regards Uwe --wkasyawrdb76jdw2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmnniYQACgkQj4D7WH0S /k4HiwgApSzuIJ1URhsrlSvh9N8JDusJG3q51TwVELmNJHyiGiApzvIMI2hf1LpH E1+5egvSwoK33C+ReJRedPagWp0Ll3IFfj2s0y3HvwrI5a76Tdf4sHvj5NHPiRIH y9KHO4wXogmzK8jd1kjTZQfVblWyXiIkrLiylpMbymhBKeStWp7DRQSV/94dIdZe Ig/lLo4/6IjeuI3hqDpPqnRIscxMXd5YdujPggb4cJWAEy0Xeh0UelFMr/++spDD 07BXWuy0sJyPh7Q0c6YyhUYR2JQTbfRGhdia/V1lPmvtICvopICdSWsFPvGyqVwX F0yDYOI9syIZGhmxoclUWCaZGbh0IA== =qXiL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wkasyawrdb76jdw2--