> Theoretically, in the current codebase, two independent net_devices can > be connected to the same GDM port so we need to check the GDM port is not > used by any other running net_device before setting the forward > configuration to FE_PSE_PORT_DROP. > > Tested-by: Xuegang Lu > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c > index 0253919714e0..1c4927c1aeb0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c > @@ -1714,8 +1714,8 @@ static int airoha_dev_open(struct net_device *netdev) > int err, len = ETH_HLEN + netdev->mtu + ETH_FCS_LEN; > struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev); > struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port; > + u32 cur_len, pse_port = FE_PSE_PORT_PPE1; > struct airoha_qdma *qdma = dev->qdma; > - u32 pse_port = FE_PSE_PORT_PPE1; > > netif_tx_start_all_queues(netdev); > err = airoha_set_vip_for_gdm_port(dev, true); > @@ -1729,10 +1729,14 @@ static int airoha_dev_open(struct net_device *netdev) > airoha_fe_clear(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_INGRESS_CFG(port->id), > GDM_STAG_EN_MASK); > > - airoha_fe_rmw(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_LEN_CFG(port->id), > - GDM_SHORT_LEN_MASK | GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK, > - FIELD_PREP(GDM_SHORT_LEN_MASK, 60) | > - FIELD_PREP(GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK, len)); > + cur_len = airoha_fe_get(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_LEN_CFG(port->id), > + GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK); > + if (!atomic_read(&port->users) || len > cur_len) > + airoha_fe_rmw(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_LEN_CFG(port->id), > + GDM_SHORT_LEN_MASK | GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK, > + FIELD_PREP(GDM_SHORT_LEN_MASK, 60) | > + FIELD_PREP(GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK, len)); > + atomic_inc(&port->users); > > airoha_qdma_set(qdma, REG_QDMA_GLOBAL_CFG, > GLOBAL_CFG_TX_DMA_EN_MASK | > @@ -1762,8 +1766,12 @@ static int airoha_dev_stop(struct net_device *netdev) > for (i = 0; i < netdev->num_tx_queues; i++) > netdev_tx_reset_subqueue(netdev, i); > > - airoha_set_gdm_port_fwd_cfg(qdma->eth, REG_GDM_FWD_CFG(port->id), > - FE_PSE_PORT_DROP); > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&port->users)) { > + airoha_set_vip_for_gdm_port(dev, false); > + airoha_set_gdm_port_fwd_cfg(qdma->eth, > + REG_GDM_FWD_CFG(port->id), > + FE_PSE_PORT_DROP); > + } > > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&qdma->users)) { > airoha_qdma_clear(qdma, REG_QDMA_GLOBAL_CFG, > @@ -1915,10 +1923,22 @@ static void airoha_dev_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, > static int airoha_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int mtu) > { > struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev); > + u32 cur_len, len = ETH_HLEN + mtu + ETH_FCS_LEN; > struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port; > - u32 len = ETH_HLEN + mtu + ETH_FCS_LEN; > struct airoha_eth *eth = dev->eth; > > + cur_len = airoha_fe_get(eth, REG_GDM_LEN_CFG(port->id), > + GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK); > + if (len < cur_len) { > + u8 port_refcnt = atomic_read(&port->users); > + > + /* We can decrease the device MTU just if the GDM port is > + * not shared or if the other device is not running. > + */ > + if (port_refcnt > 1 || (port_refcnt && !netif_running(netdev))) > + return -EBUSY; > + } > + > airoha_fe_rmw(eth, REG_GDM_LEN_CFG(port->id), > GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK, > FIELD_PREP(GDM_LONG_LEN_MASK, len)); > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h > index 207c75152fde..3a313ac439e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h > @@ -553,6 +553,8 @@ struct airoha_gdm_port { > struct airoha_gdm_dev *devs[AIROHA_MAX_NUM_GDM_DEVS]; > int id; > > + atomic_t users; > + > struct airoha_hw_stats stats; > > struct metadata_dst *dsa_meta[AIROHA_MAX_DSA_PORTS]; > > -- > 2.54.0 > Commenting on shashiko report: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260507-airoha-eth-multi-serdes-v4-0-af613b61ae02%40kernel.org - Is this call to airoha_set_vip_for_gdm_port() redundant? Looking at airoha_dev_stop(), airoha_set_vip_for_gdm_port(dev, false) is already called unconditionally earlier in the function. Since get_vip_port() returns a device-specific bitmask based on dev->nbq, does the unconditional call correctly clear the hardware bits for the specific device being stopped without affecting other devices on the same shared port? - I will fix it in v5. - Does returning -EBUSY here improperly prevent valid software MTU configurations? Instead of failing the ndo_change_mtu callback and preventing the software netdev->mtu from updating, should this code unconditionally allow the software update (netdev->mtu = mtu) and simply skip the hardware register (REG_GDM_LEN_CFG) downgrade to safely preserve the larger hardware limit required by active shared siblings? - I will fix it in v5. - Is the use of an atomic_t necessary for tracking users here? The port->users reference count appears to only be modified in ndo_open and ndo_stop, and read in ndo_change_mtu. Since all of these callback paths are inherently strictly serialized by the kernel's rtnl_lock(), could a simple integer be used instead to avoid unnecessary atomic overhead? - I will fix it in v5.