On Jul 27, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote: > On 7/27/26 11:04, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > >> This patch adds missed get_direction() function for gpio_chip. > >> Also it reimplements pinconf's get_direction() function using > >> newly defined function. > >> > >> Fixes: 1c8ace2d0725 ("pinctrl: airoha: Add support for EN7581 SoC") > >> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kshevetskiy > >> --- > >> drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++------- > >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c b/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c > >> index 820b7b0443851..b52eb39c55ff3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/airoha/pinctrl-airoha.c > >> @@ -2502,6 +2502,27 @@ static int airoha_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) > >> return err ? err : !!(val & BIT(pin)); > >> } > >> > >> +static int airoha_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) > >> +{ > >> + struct airoha_pinctrl *pinctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > >> + u32 mask, index, val; > >> + int err, field_shift; > >> + > >> + field_shift = 2 * (gpio % AIROHA_REG_GPIOCTRL_NUM_PIN); > >> + mask = GENMASK(field_shift + 1, field_shift); > > before we where checking just BIT(field_shift) as mask, while now we are > > checking two bits.  > As I know upper bits treated as reserved. I think we should not use gpio > operations if upper bit is not zero. > What is your opinion? I guess it is better to use a mask of just one bit here. Regards, Lorenzo > >   > > > >> + index = gpio / AIROHA_REG_GPIOCTRL_NUM_PIN; > >> + > >> + err = regmap_read(pinctrl->regmap, > >> + pinctrl->gpiochip.dir[index], &val); > >> + if (err) > >> + return err; > >> + > >> + if ((val & mask) > BIT(field_shift)) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + return (val & mask) ? GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT : GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN; > > nit: unnecessary brackets. > > > >> +} > >> + > >> static int airoha_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, > >> unsigned int gpio, int value) > >> { > >> @@ -2648,6 +2669,7 @@ static int airoha_pinctrl_add_gpiochip(struct airoha_pinctrl *pinctrl, > >> gc->free = gpiochip_generic_free; > >> gc->direction_input = pinctrl_gpio_direction_input; > >> gc->direction_output = airoha_gpio_direction_output; > >> + gc->get_direction = airoha_gpio_get_direction; > >> gc->set = airoha_gpio_set; > >> gc->get = airoha_gpio_get; > >> gc->base = -1; > >> @@ -2855,21 +2877,18 @@ static int airoha_pinctrl_set_conf(struct airoha_pinctrl *pinctrl, > >> static int airoha_pinconf_get_direction(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrl_dev, u32 p) > >> { > >> struct airoha_pinctrl *pinctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctrl_dev); > >> - u32 val, mask; > >> - int err, pin; > >> - u8 index; > >> + int err, gpio; > >> > >> - pin = airoha_convert_pin_to_reg_offset(pctrl_dev, NULL, p); > >> - if (pin < 0) > >> - return pin; > >> + gpio = airoha_convert_pin_to_reg_offset(pctrl_dev, NULL, p); > > if you do not rename pin in gpio here the patch will be simpler. > > > > Regards, > > Lorenzo > > > >> + if (gpio < 0) > >> + return gpio; > >> > >> - index = pin / AIROHA_REG_GPIOCTRL_NUM_PIN; > >> - err = regmap_read(pinctrl->regmap, pinctrl->gpiochip.dir[index], &val); > >> - if (err) > >> + err = airoha_gpio_get_direction(&pinctrl->gpiochip.chip, gpio); > >> + if (err < 0) > >> return err; > >> > >> - mask = BIT(2 * (pin % AIROHA_REG_GPIOCTRL_NUM_PIN)); > >> - return val & mask ? PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_ENABLE : PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE; > >> + return err == GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT ? > >> + PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_ENABLE : PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE; > >> } > >> > >> static int airoha_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrl_dev, > >> -- > >> 2.53.0 > >>