Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: phucduc.bui@gmail.com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
	Cyril Chao <Cyril.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	cassiogabrielcontato@gmail.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate APLL enable errors
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 15:03:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqf-pqvBNQ21EQZx@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f1ea5c4-d85a-43eb-8b10-3f80f8343b27@collabora.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1091 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 03:58:28PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> On 9/14/26 15:47, Mark Brown wrote:

> >  Though practically speaking the error
> > handling ends up being the same as if they couldn't fail since if
> > something goes wrong it's generally catastrophic stuff like locking the
> > core up completely so the end result is the same.

> That was also an implicit point (that should've been explicit from me): if anything
> goes horribly wrong here, it means that it already went horribly wrong "some
> function calls ago", and the platform likely already locked up as you suggested.

> In any case, I'm not against doing error checking, it's just about not doing it
> when it's really useless (I'm sure you understand my reasons), and I believe this
> specific case is one of those.

> That said, should you prefer having error checks in such places... it's not a
> performance path, so I don't really have strong opinions really.

Yeah, I think it's fine and sensible to skip the error checks in cases
where we can't really do anything constructive about the error.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14  7:28 [PATCH v2 00/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Improve error handling phucduc.bui
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Return error for missing regmap phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:26   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate APLL enable errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:22   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14 13:47     ` Mark Brown
2026-09-14 13:58       ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14 14:03         ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-09-15  6:55           ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-15  8:08             ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-15 10:40               ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate MCK " phucduc.bui
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Validate MCK ID phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:27   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate reg_rw clock errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Use dev_err_probe() for " phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:26   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate runtime resume errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:26   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-15  7:55     ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-15  8:23       ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-15  8:26         ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-15 10:43           ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Remove redundant error message phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:28   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate APLL errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate MCLK errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:28   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Validate sysclk frequency phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:28   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Propagate TDM clock errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-14  7:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] ASoC: mediatek: mt8189: Validate TDM MCLK frequency phucduc.bui
2026-09-14 13:29   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aqf-pqvBNQ21EQZx@sirena.co.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=Cyril.Chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=cassiogabrielcontato@gmail.com \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox