From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AB97D31A28 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:27:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7gkLDGpcH2ixv9Hp34Yj1+ZbXrSOZHF+yU29hk2sNpw=; b=J4LEueNbAJAGlhljnkYaf1TepB x9Kh9ihc1DphFDtv7C2BOklx9RXegLZsRlneXmb5ZGegUoaaenuKsYgnkEsOpRW4AoaGLXzeqMhJ0 s1FHdSX58dAua3C1nSynhB2i97NpDTRaOvQ2lkjPNShLwJ4iCwEVExOpu8B6yDG3T6zpuhSMxNIRK CYL6fcZZeRJA0eHspkbazKJH5H8n9qI0O0uh3S7QClzgT285th8Yjzcu0xFtSmAseF5pNW+3nh/sL DPCPQV/EnDF0n5FA5Nm6fpKqs7PuJrbT5m/J3+BnXNXMECJVXAl2ov3ZjytD2PlHcinjYTa4CdA/g 3M/vXRUg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vfwE9-00000008Kqj-3Z7U; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:27:41 +0000 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com ([148.251.105.195]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vfwE6-00000008KpE-3n6R; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:27:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1768379254; bh=8MK2K1fASDPVnowqxQJ1JsgFLtEXmJrr6pW4o1QRCyc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=UdOb5SP5TUuhuFc/WhQJMKtJekNVy54o3R38/WoQOOwEqbI7Va76TVfEYmO9/o7G0 osO2Dkd+3GI4pdGm9DxibTNa3cFFqVe8WfdT+MsFCvNhTXYBstc3/Cqb95tBD0rmIZ CJ6f+G2Di4ibr0mPV+RLLFpmBuhlT0vNaDbYp21iDG1XCJzos/SAbwVajHb7AAOaKD WBia4g9eXgNJ4B5l0m6bUV+DiclrhgU/GxxWQTWZRQcoLuhex+WX+X3acRLMP8N2cM 1TqAIYUYg0uEW9ekIygOQAyOdpljqwakRH+bvff9FedRviDiosITXaBb58PXcW+RS0 ZJVO7cSIognsw== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73DE517E0139; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:27:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:27:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: Allow single vdo/mmsys endpoint To: Rob Herring Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20260108143934.69634-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <20260113225346.GA367211-robh@kernel.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260113225346.GA367211-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260114_002739_153682_4CA9AB77 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.93 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Il 13/01/26 23:53, Rob Herring ha scritto: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:39:32PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> The hardware supports using just a single output while leaving all >> of the others unconfigured (disabled), but the binding did not >> really allow specifying a single endpoint@0, because in this case >> one must either: >> - Call the subnode `endpoint` and not declare any address and/or >> size cells; or >> - Call the subnode `endpoint@0` and have at least one more other >> endpoint(@1 or @2), and declare address/size cells. >> >> Allow specifying a single `endpoint` subnode, without the `@0` >> implicit suffix to suppress warnings happening on this kind of >> valid usecase. > > This series isn't needed. We've dropped this check from dtc. I'll do a > sync with upstream. > > In any case, it's also a W=1 warning which wouldn't be my top priority. > > Rob Oh, okay! Thanks for the feedback :D Cheers, Angelo