From: Jing-Ting Wu <jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com>,
"chris.redpath@arm.com" <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@gmail.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SPAM]Re: [Bug] Race condition between CPU hotplug off flow and __sched_setscheduler()
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 13:57:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba7ddde1829ee9eedcd6673f923d731d60719dc5.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52eea711b8ce3151ff73bfb0289cc9da0e8c4a10.camel@mediatek.com>
Hi Peter
> > How easy can you reproduce; does the below hack make it better?
>
>
> The issue can be reproduced in about 48 hours when hotplug up/down
> frequently.
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> I think the hack patch could stay the rq->balance_callback when rq-
> > callback = &balance_push_callback.
>
> We can add hack patch to the stability test.
Use the patch of previous mail, we pass the stability test at previous
48 hours and still testing.
I think the patch could make the issue better.
Do you suggest to upstream this patch to mainline?
Thank you.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 95bac3b094b3..f18ee22b29bc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -4763,20 +4763,30 @@ struct callback_head balance_push_callback
> > =
> > {
> > .func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))balance_push,
> > };
> >
> > -static inline struct callback_head
> > *splice_balance_callbacks(struct
> > rq *rq)
> > +static inline struct callback_head *
> > +__splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, bool foo)
> > {
> > struct callback_head *head = rq->balance_callback;
> >
> > lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> > - if (head)
> > - rq->balance_callback = NULL;
> > + if (head) {
> > + if (foo && head == &balance_push_callback)
> > + head = NULL;
> > + else
> > + rq->balance_callback = NULL;
> > + }
> >
> > return head;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct callback_head
> > *splice_balance_callbacks(struct
> > rq *rq)
> > +{
> > + return __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq)
> > {
> > - do_balance_callbacks(rq, splice_balance_callbacks(rq));
> > + do_balance_callbacks(rq, __splice_balance_callbacks(rq,
> > false));
> > }
> >
> > static inline void balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct
> > callback_head *head)
> >
>
Best Regards,
Jing-Ting Wu
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 12:53 [Bug] Race condition between CPU hotplug off flow and __sched_setscheduler() Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-19 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-19 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-23 7:12 ` [SPAM]Re: " Jing-Ting Wu
2022-05-26 5:57 ` Jing-Ting Wu [this message]
2022-06-02 16:15 ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-07 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-07 21:39 ` [PATCH] sched: Fix balance_push() vs __sched_setscheduler() Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-08 14:16 ` Jing-Ting Wu
2022-06-08 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba7ddde1829ee9eedcd6673f923d731d60719dc5.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=jing-ting.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=Jonathan.JMChen@mediatek.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vdonnefort@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox