From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F3EC433F5 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 22:07:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Subject:From:References:Cc:To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=eZhYr039bk8eD+RqCPNPbi+enkWvul3Ba11qd4rytGs=; b=2E+Ech060Fe6Zp ZFLRHvYuTulp/ka/w8DKnXImBKiPUJZDF/LwM+5GEMUv4DEDgSxUWVfmJnV5WDu8i6aJC99UoR36b z31Uwq1VQ0zTw/OV6hlRYaBOEfSSphltma/CRhYC4VLXMYKYmqaT/IeyA3pkwEIF+YQrRDCIc/wNi GoXdnv9xS5PhNw1NpdQiTZfpvRHKiN/7jUN/5tnGJYT9NT8/tPehP6MYMHK9uwWiF6/2U+PRmShJg Y3lhlparN6BwGC75PjAP9tKDEC7UTwhG4PETSMbzr/cW1VjVHLaqgirIYvzFNAQ7T4SKM2mCS3rpO VXh9VcftB+ofdC7+TRpQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noY0M-004B3G-N6; Tue, 10 May 2022 22:06:54 +0000 Received: from nbd.name ([2a01:4f8:221:3d45::2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noY0A-004B0x-Sy; Tue, 10 May 2022 22:06:44 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nbd.name; s=20160729; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Subject: From:References:Cc:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BhPDuCZhU013enU/ezL39tFkaksHmV+NLwg0WAYz1Ww=; b=KOt0bgXFpEGiFG29hcGikLWsBW kCtuR/Jf4HUtRukiWGZZ1fBe+6W/yhShGpA69RR/Y72BX/9p/jbPkkuYkMJpxrcEXQ3SA/KurEZnb vuhmwEz1Tmy5Qm5pElBsb3TqqpBXYHmILip3WOveBFZhHS7IAQSoX8W7oAiPasydoDkQ=; Received: from p200300daa70ef200adfdb724d8b39c56.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:da:a70e:f200:adfd:b724:d8b3:9c56] helo=nf.local) by ds12 with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1noXzv-0001pa-2S; Wed, 11 May 2022 00:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 00:06:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220510094014.68440-1-nbd@nbd.name> <20220510123724.i2xqepc56z4eouh2@skbuf> <5959946d-1d34-49b9-1abe-9f9299cc194e@nbd.name> <20220510165233.yahsznxxb5yq6rai@skbuf> From: Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: tag_mtk: add padding for tx packets In-Reply-To: <20220510165233.yahsznxxb5yq6rai@skbuf> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220510_150643_154555_AAB4FDAE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.48 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 10.05.22 18:52, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> >> On 10.05.22 14:37, Vladimir Oltean wrote: >> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:40:13AM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> > > Padding for transmitted packets needs to account for the special tag. >> > > With not enough padding, garbage bytes are inserted by the switch at the >> > > end of small packets. >> > >> > I don't think padding bytes are guaranteed to be zeroes. Aren't they >> > discarded? What is the issue? >> With the broken padding, ARP requests are silently discarded on the receiver >> side in my test. Adding the padding explicitly fixes the issue. >> >> - Felix > > Ok, I'm not going to complain too much about the patch, but I'm still > curious where are the so-called "broken" packets discarded. > I think the receiving MAC should be passing up to software a buffer > without the extra padding beyond the L2 payload length (at least that's > the behavior I'm familiar with). I don't know where exactly these packets are discarded. After digging through the devices I used during the tests, I just found some leftover pcap files that show the differences in the received packets. Since the packets are bigger after my patch, I can't rule out that packet size instead of the padding may have made a difference here in getting the ARP requests accepted by the receiver. I've extracted the ARP requests and you can find them here: http://nbd.name/arp-broken.pcap http://nbd.name/arp-working.pcap - Felix _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek