From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, incogcyberpunk@proton.me,
johan.hedberg@gmail.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Avoid btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() NULL deref
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 18:04:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be1cbae6-f868-4939-a1c1-fd66e2c6b23e@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120081227.v3.1.I1ae7aebc967e52c7c4be7aa65fbd81736649568a@changeid>
Dear Douglas,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 20.11.25 um 17:12 schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> In btusb_mtk_setup(), we set `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` to:
> usb_ifnum_to_if(data->udev, MTK_ISO_IFNUM)
>
> That function can return NULL in some cases. Even when it returns
> NULL, though, we still go on to call btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf().
>
> As of commit e9087e828827 ("Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Add locks for
> usb_driver_claim_interface()"), calling btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf()
> when `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` is NULL will cause a crash because
> we'll end up passing a bad pointer to device_lock(). Prior to that
> commit we'd pass the NULL pointer directly to
> usb_driver_claim_interface() which would detect it and return an
> error, which was handled.
>
> Resolve the crash in btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() by adding a NULL check
> at the start of the function. This makes the code handle a NULL
> `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf` the same way it did before the problematic
> commit (just with a slight change to the error message printed).
>
> Reported-by: IncogCyberpunk <incogcyberpunk@proton.me>
> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/r/a380d061-479e-4713-bddd-1d6571ca7e86@leemhuis.info
> Fixes: e9087e828827 ("Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Add locks for usb_driver_claim_interface()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Tested-by: IncogCyberpunk <incogcyberpunk@proton.me>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Added Cc to stable.
> - Added IncogCyberpunk Tested-by tag.
> - v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20251119092641.v2.1.I1ae7aebc967e52c7c4be7aa65fbd81736649568a@changeid
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Rebase atop commit 529ac8e706c3 ("Bluetooth: ... mtk iso interface")
> - v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20251119085354.1.I1ae7aebc967e52c7c4be7aa65fbd81736649568a@changeid
>
> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index fcc62e2fb641..683ac02e964b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -2751,6 +2751,11 @@ static void btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf(struct btusb_data *data)
> if (!btmtk_data)
> return;
>
> + if (!btmtk_data->isopkt_intf) {
> + bt_dev_err(data->hdev, "Can't claim NULL iso interface");
As an error is printed now, what should be done about? Do drivers need
fixing? Is it broken hardware?
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * The function usb_driver_claim_interface() is documented to need
> * locks held if it's not called from a probe routine. The code here
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 16:12 [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: btusb: mediatek: Avoid btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf() NULL deref Douglas Anderson
2025-11-20 17:04 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2025-11-20 17:13 ` Doug Anderson
2025-11-20 18:50 ` patchwork-bot+bluetooth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be1cbae6-f868-4939-a1c1-fd66e2c6b23e@molgen.mpg.de \
--to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=incogcyberpunk@proton.me \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).