From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EFEC04FFE for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 10:12:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From :Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=7ckLWZcstPPxfSvC4qz7Ukfw1g9kry8h4VTkoUpZ7I0=; b=aJaEh3ItyrANdbpoXiSnPf4qwa 36qO1iBMRmOxZKijkpseXHf8jNJ5ZX6Xg/jROcAO0x5JIXiNW1+f0JaU+HnF32V4VrIC5yBbw7dGk bE6roZ/6OWnNa2a1b2sAa14hmNoaKJwqLtQNjDCt/KG//tIAJQubjMPbuA1hYkWhs0EJPuygb2bS0 G7kXF1HOTEZGy0xvuuTfgnsb6MpdqmDBtkZK3KKsp7RuwbOsPgoMrc7OzNhtDxlEGm0Y2KV+PIlwB HfwS03IFddpyRt3vjofalFXy6pQD0UDQSwVPtIPTqtG7Kb7JaB7C0+K0cKL7DmhcLo3vMiwkiiV3k KWkmpWsw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s9007-0000000E6BT-0MQX; Mon, 20 May 2024 10:12:15 +0000 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com ([46.235.227.194]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s9002-0000000E69w-3Inj; Mon, 20 May 2024 10:12:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1716199929; bh=6NDH0z522me5vrgmflzfx3WQmnMcDdrAZ53MUWxQv/4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=3RKlVEnwwt+L5N6iv4pr5sMiBA1t3K7kWgvqTEz2d1rPQs0u9QxBIfxWjsU5Ch537 MwoEupaZcfEH4C6n5h8R0IDoqxWmROmYlaHoRlRJ7wjPrBZ/Q2kUZEOg5xMLmKHsni LVSNEE08mvwsn0Jen6ElZtG6U57kCmUC11S4ghbAqW0cEyQAuYpJesHhj8ADRfXdR4 5qHAg0a9Wh0ytta1OEjeFBngPVBUthhT1DGluv2H5NzRfI/2ci45MZdCBWuUId4/nQ TlCXVJzXpd2Jo6UUexOJwg2S72A7G0xA08/Z8OG9HNea6u1utU6oHEu+C8h44MZUUM Ah+2Y+6LS3jtA== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B0B037809D1; Mon, 20 May 2024 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 12:12:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8365: use a specific SCPSYS compatible To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , MandyJH Liu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Alexandre Mergnat References: <20240518211159.142920-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20240518211159.142920-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <2cc638ca-0add-4c8c-b844-606e22dbd253@linaro.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <2cc638ca-0add-4c8c-b844-606e22dbd253@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240520_031211_148007_1235C76A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Il 20/05/24 12:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: > On 20/05/2024 11:55, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: >>> SoCs should use dedicated compatibles for each of their syscon nodes to >>> precisely describe the block. Using an incorrect compatible does not >>> allow to properly match/validate children of the syscon device. Replace >>> SYSCFG compatible, which does not have children, with a new dedicated >>> one for SCPSYS block. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> Technically, that's not a SCPSYS block, but called SYSCFG in MT8365, but the >> meaning and the functioning is the same, so it's fine for me. > > So there are two syscfg blocks? With exactly the same set of registers > or different? > I'm not sure about that, I don't have the MT8365 datasheet... Adding Alexandre to the loop - I think he can clarify as he should have the required documentation. Cheers