* [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two companion arrays? @ 2025-11-19 15:52 Markus Elfring 2025-11-20 10:05 ` Lee Jones 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2025-11-19 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, Lee Jones, Matthias Brugger Cc: LKML Hello, I have taken another look also at the implementation of the function “mt6358_irq_init”. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc6/source/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c#L227-L293 I see that there are two arrays allocated so far. How do you think about the possibility to use a single array with the needed data instead? Regards, Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two companion arrays? 2025-11-19 15:52 [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two companion arrays? Markus Elfring @ 2025-11-20 10:05 ` Lee Jones 2025-11-20 10:51 ` Markus Elfring 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Lee Jones @ 2025-11-20 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, Matthias Brugger, LKML On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Markus Elfring wrote: > Hello, > > I have taken another look also at the implementation of the function “mt6358_irq_init”. > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc6/source/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c#L227-L293 > > I see that there are two arrays allocated so far. > How do you think about the possibility to use a single array with the needed data instead? It'll be easier if you just submit the patch. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two companion arrays? 2025-11-20 10:05 ` Lee Jones @ 2025-11-20 10:51 ` Markus Elfring 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Markus Elfring @ 2025-11-20 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lee Jones, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, Matthias Brugger Cc: LKML >> I have taken another look also at the implementation of the function “mt6358_irq_init”. >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc6/source/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c#L227-L293 >> >> I see that there are two arrays allocated so far. >> How do you think about the possibility to use a single array with the needed data instead? > > It'll be easier if you just submit the patch. I would appreciate to clarify before if the adjustment of array usage can influence software run time characteristics in desirable directions here. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc6/source/include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h#L19-L26 Regards, Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-20 10:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-11-19 15:52 [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two companion arrays? Markus Elfring 2025-11-20 10:05 ` Lee Jones 2025-11-20 10:51 ` Markus Elfring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).