From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6359: Drop bogus vcn33_[12]_* split regulators
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 09:31:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e14ae934-e448-433f-987d-77bede5f6d07@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXv+5ESnhsVfu5pWf1DEt35+10ZKTgJ5G6DuJC4s6yEpRH_YQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 23/03/2026 09:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 5:54 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 03:24:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> vcn33_[12]_bt and vcn33_[12]_wifi refer to the same output. There are
>>> two enable bits in the registers so that BT and WiFi drivers can toggle
>>> them separately without any coordination. If either bit is set, then the
>>> regulator output is enabled.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately some of them are already referenced by in-tree device
>>> trees. To keep backward compatibility with them, keep the vcn33_*_bt
>>
>> So you drop "_wifi" regulators breaking the ABI, no?
>
> Indeed it is a breakage. I kept the *_bt part to cover all in-tree
> device trees.
>
> But the representation itself is broken, as explained in the commit
> message.
>
> I leave it to the platform maintainers to decide whether this "breakage"
> to fix the broken representation is acceptable.
>
> Note that there is a similar issue with the *_sshub and non _sshub
> regulators: there is only one actual output for the two. I'm still
> asking the vendor for hardware behavior specifics.
>
>>> regulator. Also combine them for a shorten regular expression pattern.
>>
>> Instead the duplicates should be deprecated and driver should still
>> support the "_wifi" variants.
>
> But it doesn't really work in the driver. You cannot set different
> constraints on the two, especially conflicting constraints, and expect
> them to work. And if you set the voltage on one of them, the other
> will change as well.
Of course, but now imagine a DTB with only *_wifi regulators and no *_bt.
>
> If we want the driver to support both with _sane_ behavior, we would
> need to introduce some sort of alias lookup for both reading
> constraints and resolving supplies. The driver registers _just_ one
> regulator, and both DT nodes resolve to it.
Yes, either alias lookup or adjusting the regulator_desc before
registering them, depending on the nodes.
If I understood old code correctly, the point is that ABI allowed *_wifi
without *_bt and this would be a working setup. Now it won't work.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 7:24 [PATCH 0/5] regulator: mt6359: cleanup and add supplies Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6359: Drop regulator-name pattern restrictions Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-20 9:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6359: Drop bogus vcn33_[12]_* split regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-20 9:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-23 8:26 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-23 8:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-03-24 3:42 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6359: Add regulator supplies Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-20 9:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] regulator: mt6359: Drop bogus vcn33_[12]_* split regulators Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-03-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] regulator: mt6359: Add regulator supply names Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e14ae934-e448-433f-987d-77bede5f6d07@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox