From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39FEBC04FFE for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:55:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From :Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=mXSv6WWmHQn9FHdutaQk99BxKYfXAJQoKj61lMpU2fo=; b=pMseQNLtowUabwE6UvM0x8vz0W SuQ9LcvVGV2VhueQRFm7YH9qKbnS96l9heGdO0uWRatMd0XJQQGPDh2r0KsdJ42DuNBRNNEDkBYAY Zar2POryujefIiYzUX6v0fvI9bC9BydSAZPbGVkT6jYGsKMxg/NDKyTQKwkeOJiuO31F+XDYb5KhG wRlAxHyCh4VKEW0MuA7ei4k+yv8cHn1E42V9Vf8LVcQ3ZnlNtacRnpGwdRSht05ytkY+LQhNKm7Cm qSrkgFb7O/FgT06QSuuuOWlV4RTA8ZDfu7oFCe9P0IhnRJkTeXQXbBlALM/9pePOjHbfLLFgZY7RD jnel+wDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s8zkD-0000000E3ZC-1Tsj; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:55:49 +0000 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com ([2a00:1098:ed:100::25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s8zkA-0000000E3Yb-1P8f; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:55:47 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1716198944; bh=rzE7nnaPg+u62UlsV6bG5IQXkGCAxUqcoHM8hLYB1OU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=4gFFiyZpSOvXFnhQYJ3KqTyRJEbDDkrgy1aZsXHaxvVvjado3VaUT0E0Bpvni3tMC erGzuMR6kF2FJtwMH/YhlKMWPQLI6cFaizPwvFuaMaY5DFOmqFLKCpK6JEa6m5X6Qn RZGGi7dVEAN4fSAVlWij5D8ub2gTdBfPWxgpRLbqhV5YIjXvE+vgBjnhKlieocvJJh DdXvsXAcLke8ibqtcjUH2oOpg/RhcLOrIZIibrNXVj3v2E0aKsX1uWQpe/4dqQfRTt r/CE3dFpFiloVdx3uAam+zxUpcHMHsHwvx+k3XBihTmf5gFDyMgYzHvShEYNGtZcrm 7loLBm5oWzr2A== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1820B37820CD; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 11:55:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8365: use a specific SCPSYS compatible To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , MandyJH Liu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20240518211159.142920-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20240518211159.142920-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20240518211159.142920-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240520_025546_559404_7CAF5CC4 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.83 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: > SoCs should use dedicated compatibles for each of their syscon nodes to > precisely describe the block. Using an incorrect compatible does not > allow to properly match/validate children of the syscon device. Replace > SYSCFG compatible, which does not have children, with a new dedicated > one for SCPSYS block. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Technically, that's not a SCPSYS block, but called SYSCFG in MT8365, but the meaning and the functioning is the same, so it's fine for me. Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno