From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 09 May 2003 09:14:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:202.145.53.89] ([IPv6:::ffff:202.145.53.89]:43966 "EHLO miao.coventive.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 May 2003 09:14:24 +0100 Received: from pc208 (PC208.ia.kh.coventive.com [192.168.23.208] (may be forged)) by miao.coventive.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h498E8x22657; Fri, 9 May 2003 16:14:10 +0800 Message-ID: <001f01c31603$1ed7fbd0$d017a8c0@pc208> From: "smills_ho" To: , References: <3EB0B329.9030603@ict.ac.cn> <16048.55936.346808.522687@cuddles.redhat.com> <3EB0DDC6.5080108@ict.ac.cn> <16048.57054.224964.883062@cuddles.redhat.com> <20030501085018.GA1885@greglaptop.attbi.com> <000a01c315cf$8171ac70$d017a8c0@pc208> <1052464867.2485.3.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> <3EBB58C6.3070604@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 16:15:12 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2316 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: smills_ho@coventive.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Dear Kumba, Should we try this binutils-2.13.90.0.20? We try the version binutils-2.13.90.0.18 (Debian used) and it is failed on cross-gcc step :-( Thanks and best regards, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kumba" To: Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X > Oddly enough, I followed these basic steps and wound up with a working > cross-compiler from sparc64 -> mipseb (Sun Blade 100 to mips > big-endian). Gcc nor glibc gave me any issues.....However, when I tried > the same exact steps on i686, glibc complained about libgcc not being > available, among other things. It's got me baffled, but I'm not exactly > complaining. Currently, it's gcc-3.2.3 (propolice patched) + > glibc-2.3.2 + binutils-2.13.90.0.20, which it'll get rebuilt for the new > binutils 2.14. > > --Kumba > > > > Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 19:05, smills_ho wrote: > > > >>Dear All, > >> I want to make a cross-compilered glibc-2.3.x and I get the source from > >>ftp.gun.org. GCC version is 3.2.3, binutils is 2.13.2.1. The step is as > >>following: > >> > >>1. Try to build binutils > >>2. Try to make static GCC > >>3. Try to make glibc -----> Then it is failed > >> > >>Is there anybody know what's going on or somebody had successfully to build > >>the crossed glibc-2.3.x? > > > > > > A host cross host compiler for linux systems is a little more involved > > than this :) > > > > However, I don't know where you went wrong since you really didn't > > provide much in the way of information as to what you did or where it > > failed. > > > > -eric > > > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <001f01c31603$1ed7fbd0$d017a8c0@pc208> From: "smills_ho" References: <3EB0B329.9030603@ict.ac.cn> <16048.55936.346808.522687@cuddles.redhat.com> <3EB0DDC6.5080108@ict.ac.cn> <16048.57054.224964.883062@cuddles.redhat.com> <20030501085018.GA1885@greglaptop.attbi.com> <000a01c315cf$8171ac70$d017a8c0@pc208> <1052464867.2485.3.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> <3EBB58C6.3070604@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 16:15:12 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org To: kumba@gentoo.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20030509081512.OV3gun5m91zIxLxG-rf6TfHzoT1qg5rf-19dITgnAtg@z> Dear Kumba, Should we try this binutils-2.13.90.0.20? We try the version binutils-2.13.90.0.18 (Debian used) and it is failed on cross-gcc step :-( Thanks and best regards, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kumba" To: Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X > Oddly enough, I followed these basic steps and wound up with a working > cross-compiler from sparc64 -> mipseb (Sun Blade 100 to mips > big-endian). Gcc nor glibc gave me any issues.....However, when I tried > the same exact steps on i686, glibc complained about libgcc not being > available, among other things. It's got me baffled, but I'm not exactly > complaining. Currently, it's gcc-3.2.3 (propolice patched) + > glibc-2.3.2 + binutils-2.13.90.0.20, which it'll get rebuilt for the new > binutils 2.14. > > --Kumba > > > > Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 19:05, smills_ho wrote: > > > >>Dear All, > >> I want to make a cross-compilered glibc-2.3.x and I get the source from > >>ftp.gun.org. GCC version is 3.2.3, binutils is 2.13.2.1. The step is as > >>following: > >> > >>1. Try to build binutils > >>2. Try to make static GCC > >>3. Try to make glibc -----> Then it is failed > >> > >>Is there anybody know what's going on or somebody had successfully to build > >>the crossed glibc-2.3.x? > > > > > > A host cross host compiler for linux systems is a little more involved > > than this :) > > > > However, I don't know where you went wrong since you really didn't > > provide much in the way of information as to what you did or where it > > failed. > > > > -eric > > > >