From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5A8C433FE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA8260F92 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233537AbhJYO2i (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:28:38 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:23168 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233533AbhJYO2g (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:28:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635171973; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bye7ObUVwxXJ2WkSXV7ATW6vdQkdYkTKPDS9mWywO4k=; b=VG20wsfW81XXPKqAw5GP7sPzbhA4Uz7GMRjfobhJBnMpVfvvUHWtqpsDWNV2Ht62lM784j pmJYBcOfQP8oznAKfuriTSHgRiFZxel+Z5PdBLZkPiya2ceE8r5gdUcHnnS6TYFTDxslEe 4hEwvDnnw9gXIQwLAumNBYRTW6lPNLM= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-204-Yx8lj0ggNWm5VIqH284l-A-1; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:26:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Yx8lj0ggNWm5VIqH284l-A-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id v9-20020a50d849000000b003dcb31eabaaso10098576edj.13 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 07:26:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bye7ObUVwxXJ2WkSXV7ATW6vdQkdYkTKPDS9mWywO4k=; b=NcY1mvcAaqKdUVyb60+7uMcNTwrm2UUq3kXoXsl/xbfWRNpGvP4njNjHTvA+hQW3XC qlWO9sXCvAwoue0UhTquGBMt6G7e3X0v0skeSUrUnbCONOj0teBjQGPmO7W447x10TvT dfSVIDt666Iqk9s/P5gZgaJM0O3xZ5XijF9gnEQlCfcv5fP6SIJXxOa8uZDXJoBLLHKu g7e1uaHNTD+Amltpz2dlAahf5elifWpxtg2Psmf914Wix7OR50pw79ictUp07xb4ik4p +TpE7P9JYjPGYtmM5uvkUuFfcWH4v1MCqkhKveEu3jBWRxsA6jL7Cd3bnrh7dnli4ajn lj0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lP/6KYlyhBK202wS6v56B279ITlXvi7BtcAy7TSvBo8jlnnrp MIP3gqD36LrvvlRwYRgY+jDCpWavPXnEqGFrqPSNQsn9De09F3xLYFSy0guYdi345W4R/MhGEML ONbPrkwil/4J3zshqGSu4Dw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c0cf:: with SMTP id bn15mr21819121ejb.54.1635171971316; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 07:26:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1tQyM0wVdwMUOMrIgmjrbrmjI7F4R9FGcgAmNEuZGC3NNZA+IU7BqgOO63yxAXGZ3HmbepA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c0cf:: with SMTP id bn15mr21819096ejb.54.1635171971137; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 07:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g14sm5171403edp.31.2021.10.25.07.26.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 07:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0072221e-02e8-4d60-9b0f-80d8c423bf4e@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:26:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/43] KVM: Don't redo ktime_get() when calculating halt-polling stop/deadline Content-Language: en-US To: Sean Christopherson , Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank Cc: James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-17-seanjc@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini In-Reply-To: <20211009021236.4122790-17-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Calculate the halt-polling "stop" time using "cur" instead of redoing > ktime_get(). In the happy case where hardware correctly predicts > do_halt_poll, "cur" is only a few cycles old. And if the branch is > mispredicted, arguably that extra latency should count toward the > halt-polling time. > > In all likelihood, the numbers involved are in the noise and either > approach is perfectly ok. Using "start" makes the change even more obvious, so: Calculate the halt-polling "stop" time using "start" instead of redoing ktime_get(). In practice, the numbers involved are in the noise (e.g., in the happy case where hardware correctly predicts do_halt_poll and there are no interrupts, "start" is probably only a few cycles old) and either approach is perfectly ok. But it's more precise to count any extra latency toward the halt-polling time. Paolo