From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6E9lvRw004284 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:47:57 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g6E9lu2W004283 for linux-mips-outgoing; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:47:56 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from mx2.mips.com (mx2.mips.com [206.31.31.227]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6E9lqRw004274 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:47:53 -0700 Received: from newman.mips.com (ns-dmz [206.31.31.225]) by mx2.mips.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6E9qUXb020314 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grendel (grendel [192.168.236.16]) by newman.mips.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id CAA03294; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 02:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00a801c22b1c$446a6fe0$10eca8c0@grendel> From: "Kevin D. Kissell" To: "Kevin D. Kissell" , References: <023e01c22a5e$c013f120$10eca8c0@grendel> Subject: Re: Gcc v2.96 versus Trolltech QtEmbedded Window System Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:53:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Many thanks to all of you who replied with suggestions. I was able to repeat the experiment on a system with essentially the same configuration as my own, except with 256MB of memory instead of 32M. The compilation that took 20 hours to get to 90MB if virtual size completed in something like 5 minutes, with the last sampled virtual footprint being 94MB. Now all I've gotta do is to squeeze the resulting build tree across an ISDN line back to my own system to install, but even if that comes out to hundreds of megabytes, it'll be faster than a local build. ;-) Regards, Kevin K. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <00a801c22b1c$446a6fe0$10eca8c0@grendel> From: "Kevin D. Kissell" References: <023e01c22a5e$c013f120$10eca8c0@grendel> Subject: Re: Gcc v2.96 versus Trolltech QtEmbedded Window System Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:53:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com To: "Kevin D. Kissell" , linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <20020714095310.ysYb5Cf950dvKl94J24QCcNgFaGveub0Fw7kxUsKtkU@z> Many thanks to all of you who replied with suggestions. I was able to repeat the experiment on a system with essentially the same configuration as my own, except with 256MB of memory instead of 32M. The compilation that took 20 hours to get to 90MB if virtual size completed in something like 5 minutes, with the last sampled virtual footprint being 94MB. Now all I've gotta do is to squeeze the resulting build tree across an ISDN line back to my own system to install, but even if that comes out to hundreds of megabytes, it'll be faster than a local build. ;-) Regards, Kevin K.