From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:29:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com ([IPv6:::ffff:66.163.175.83]:15257 "HELO smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com") by linux-mips.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:28:57 +0100 Received: (qmail 89543 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2005 19:29:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (ppopov@embeddedalley.com@71.128.175.242 with plain) by smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jul 2005 19:29:01 -0000 Subject: Re: compiling error of linux 2.6.12 recent cvs head for db1550 using defconfig From: Pete Popov Reply-To: ppopov@embeddedalley.com To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" In-Reply-To: References: <2db32b7205070616124fa47ef3@mail.gmail.com> <1120694886.5724.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:29:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1120764548.5777.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8396 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ppopov@embeddedalley.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:22 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Pete Popov wrote: > > > Maciej, I assume you built a kernel for one of the Au1x boards before > > you applied the patch ;)? > > Certainly not -- I don't maintain that part of the tree in any sense -- I > don't even have any related hardware, so why should I bother? Well, I understand you don't have the HW so you can't test the patch. But at least it should compile, imho. > I sent the > patch for public review to let interested parties exactly to catch such > problems -- I even mentioned explicitly I only did a minimal arrangement > for the Au1000 code. Pete