From: Alex Gonzalez <linux-mips@packetvision.com>
To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Benchmarking RM9000
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:25:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1120825549.28569.949.camel@euskadi.packetvision> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050708120238.GA2816@linux-mips.org>
Hi,
I am doing some basic benchmarking tests on our RM9000 based platform,
running on just one of the two cores (non-smp kernel).
I would be very interesting in seeing some comparative data as we seem
to experience some performance problems.
Even if no data is available, any comments on this results will also be
appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
----------------------------------------------------
BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 360.48 : 9.24 : 3.04
STRING SORT : 31.23 : 13.95 : 2.16
BITFIELD : 8.4132e+07 : 14.43 : 3.01
FP EMULATION : 32.921 : 15.80 : 3.65
FOURIER : 3383 : 3.85 : 2.16
ASSIGNMENT : 4.2422 : 16.14 : 4.19
IDEA : 1543.3 : 23.60 : 7.01
HUFFMAN : 382.56 : 10.61 : 3.39
NEURAL NET : 3.7153 : 5.97 : 2.51
LU DECOMPOSITION : 209.28 : 10.84 : 7.83
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 14.242
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 6.291
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU :
L2 Cache :
OS : Linux 2.6.12-rc3
C compiler : gcc version 3.3.5
libc : libc-2.3.5.so
MEMORY INDEX : 3.010
INTEGER INDEX : 4.026
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 3.489
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-08 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050708091711Z8226352-3678+1954@linux-mips.org>
2005-07-08 12:02 ` CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux Ralf Baechle
2005-07-08 12:12 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-08 13:43 ` Richard Sandiford
2005-07-08 13:55 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-07-08 12:25 ` Alex Gonzalez [this message]
2005-07-08 13:54 ` Benchmarking RM9000 Laurence Darby
[not found] ` <20050708130131.GC2816@linux-mips.org>
2005-07-08 14:42 ` Alex Gonzalez
2005-07-10 23:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-07-11 15:43 ` Alex Gonzalez
2005-07-12 9:42 ` Ralf Rösch
2005-07-11 11:09 ` Laurence Darby
2005-07-11 11:55 ` Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2005-07-08 14:35 Alex Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1120825549.28569.949.camel@euskadi.packetvision \
--to=linux-mips@packetvision.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox