From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:49:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from deliver-1.mx.triera.net ([IPv6:::ffff:213.161.0.31]:34500 "HELO deliver-1.mx.triera.net") by linux-mips.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:49:03 +0100 Received: from localhost (in-2.mx.triera.net [213.161.0.26]) by deliver-1.mx.triera.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC995C04D; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:49:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.triera.net (smtp.triera.net [213.161.0.30]) by in-2.mx.triera.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A6941BC08D; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:50:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orionlinux.starfleet.com (cmb58-52.dial-up.arnes.si [153.5.49.52]) by smtp.triera.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117DF1A18AD; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:50:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Au1550 ethernet throughput low From: Matej Kupljen To: jaypee@hotpop.com Cc: linux-mips In-Reply-To: <1121270402l.7656l.3l@cavan> References: <1121270402l.7656l.3l@cavan> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Ultra d.o.o. Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:02:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1121353347.10582.3.camel@orionlinux.starfleet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Triera AV Service Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8481 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: matej.kupljen@ultra.si Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hi > I've got a au1550 board based largely on the pb1550. The ethernet > throughput is ~66Mbps using the 2.6 kernel. This also consumes a > lot of cpu cycles to send. I get low throughput with DB1200 also, although I did not measure it (yet). I noticed very slow NFS mounted rootfs and I get a lot of: NFS server not responding, still trying NFS server O.K. (Something like that, I do not have the board here right now). AMD supplies smc9111 driver in smc9111.c/h. Should I use this driver or is smc9x.c/h better? BR, Matej