From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:05:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp004.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com ([IPv6:::ffff:66.163.175.81]:28804 "HELO smtp004.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com") by linux-mips.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:05:28 +0100 Received: (qmail 17192 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2005 15:06:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (ppopov@embeddedalley.com@71.128.175.242 with plain) by smtp004.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 2005 15:06:40 -0000 Subject: Re: Au1550 ethernet throughput low From: Pete Popov Reply-To: ppopov@embeddedalley.com To: Matej Kupljen Cc: jaypee@hotpop.com, linux-mips In-Reply-To: <1121353347.10582.3.camel@orionlinux.starfleet.com> References: <1121270402l.7656l.3l@cavan> <1121353347.10582.3.camel@orionlinux.starfleet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:06:46 -0700 Message-Id: <1121353606.4797.346.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8483 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ppopov@embeddedalley.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:02 +0200, Matej Kupljen wrote: > Hi > > > I've got a au1550 board based largely on the pb1550. The ethernet > > throughput is ~66Mbps using the 2.6 kernel. This also consumes a > > lot of cpu cycles to send. Completely different ethernet drivers. The 1550 throughput should be very good. I haven't noticed any issues with 2.6 on my db1550 but I haven't run netperf lately. I'll do it when I have a little time. Pete > I get low throughput with DB1200 also, although I did not measure > it (yet). I noticed very slow NFS mounted rootfs and I get a lot of: > NFS server not responding, still trying > NFS server O.K. > (Something like that, I do not have the board here right now). > > AMD supplies smc9111 driver in smc9111.c/h. Should I use > this driver or is smc9x.c/h better? > > BR, > Matej > >