From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:21:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp-out.hotpop.com ([IPv6:::ffff:38.113.3.61]:10198 "EHLO smtp-out.hotpop.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:21:03 +0100 Received: from hotpop.com (kubrick.hotpop.com [38.113.3.103]) by smtp-out.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9949A156C07B for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cavan (unknown [62.253.252.7]) by smtp-3.hotpop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35FE17ADC0B; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:25:20 +0000 From: jaypee@hotpop.com Subject: Re: Au1xxx ethernet race condition? To: Jerry , linux-mips References: <1123749337l.30285l.5l@cavan> <1905543925.20050811120527@wicomtechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: <1905543925.20050811120527@wicomtechnologies.com> (from jerry@wicomtechnologies.com on Thu Aug 11 10:05:27 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.3 Message-Id: <1123752323l.30285l.7l@cavan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-HotPOP: ----------------------------------------------- Sent By HotPOP.com FREE Email Get your FREE POP email at www.HotPOP.com ----------------------------------------------- Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8738 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: jaypee@hotpop.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > We are dealing with au1200 and there are some problems around > at least with udp timeouts and maybe low perfomance. But it > seems to be driver problems (occurs both in 2.4 and 2.6) besides > au1200 does not use au1000_eth.c > > Maybe your problem is somewhere else, and maybe it is completely > different. > Agreed, I don't think au1000_eth.c is a problem as far throughput goes. - -- mailto:jaypee@hotpop.com http://www.jaypee.org.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFC+xmDZDxnKy3oOpYRAkAGAJjZLla7TN9Mcny1o9H/QAoJQpfiAKCFUDmU eOfmPvEPqbMgtpZxmK9Npg== =IrC3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----