From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 01 Sep 2005 07:58:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from deliver-1.mx.triera.net ([IPv6:::ffff:213.161.0.31]:15271 "HELO deliver-1.mx.triera.net") by linux-mips.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 07:58:40 +0100 Received: from localhost (in-2.mx.triera.net [213.161.0.26]) by deliver-1.mx.triera.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E48C019 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.triera.net (smtp.triera.net [213.161.0.30]) by in-2.mx.triera.net (Postfix) with SMTP id EEB571BC07B for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.18.1.53] (unknown [213.161.20.168]) by smtp.triera.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A7C1A18AD for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 09:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: DBAU1200 network performacne From: Matej Kupljen To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:03:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1125558191.6063.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Triera AV Service Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 8852 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: matej.kupljen@ultra.si Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hi I am working on DBAu1200 platform and I am testing network performance with the smc91111 driver from AMD and smc91x driver, which should be preferred (right?). Tests are done on kernel 2.6.11-rc5 with the netperf, running netserver on target and netperf on host. If I run netserver on host and netperf on target, I get: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ recv_response: partial response received: 0 bytes What does that mean? OK, the results: 1) With the smc91111 I get: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 43689 16384 16384 30.02 20.95 2) With the smc91x I get: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 43689 16384 16384 30.01 27.61 Is this expected trough-put? Can somebody else test it, please? Oh, when using smc91x I get: eth0: link down Sending BOOTP requests .<6>eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x4DE1 So, link should be 100Mbps. BR, Matej