From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:46:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp102.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([IPv6:::ffff:68.142.200.237]:52356 "HELO smtp102.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by linux-mips.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:45:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 81429 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2005 19:45:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.105?) (ppopov@embeddedalley.com@71.128.175.242 with plain) by smtp102.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2005 19:45:36 -0000 Subject: stale board ports, again From: Pete Popov Reply-To: ppopov@embeddedalley.com To: "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:45:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1127245542.4948.269.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9001 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ppopov@embeddedalley.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Is there anyone using the mtx-1, csb250, or xxs1500 in 2.6? If so, how badly broken are they and does anyone want to maintain them or is it time to nuke them? Thanks, Pete