From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:59:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:44560 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1493329AbZJVR73 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:59:29 +0200 Received: from [192.168.23.10] (really [74.67.89.75]) by hrndva-omta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20091022175922804.MUFD15360@hrndva-omta03.mail.rr.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:59:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 4/9] tracing: add static function tracer support for MIPS From: Steven Rostedt Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org To: wuzhangjin@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ralf Baechle , Nicholas Mc Guire In-Reply-To: <1256233679.23653.7.camel@falcon> References: <028867b99ec532b84963a35e7d552becc783cafc.1256135456.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <2f73eae542c47ac5bbb9f7280e6c0271d193e90d.1256135456.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <3f0d3515f74a58f4cfd11e61b62a129fdc21e3a7.1256135456.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <1256138686.18347.3039.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1256233679.23653.7.camel@falcon> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Inc. Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:21 -0400 Message-Id: <1256234361.20866.796.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 24449 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: rostedt@goodmis.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 01:47 +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:24 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Is t0 and t1 safe for mcount to use? Remember, mcount does not follow > > the dynamics of C function ABI. > > So, perhaps we can use the saved registers(a0,a1...) instead. I don't know. I was just asking. -- Steve