From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 23 May 2005 16:07:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp.wicomtechnologies.com ([IPv6:::ffff:195.234.214.162]:52416 "EHLO smtp.wicomtechnologies.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:07:14 +0100 Received: from jerry (wcm-24.wicom.kiev.ua [192.168.0.24] (may be forged)) by smtp.wicomtechnologies.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4NF6v5K002964; Mon, 23 May 2005 18:06:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jerry@wicomtechnologies.com) Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 18:08:19 +0300 From: Jerry X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional Reply-To: Jerry X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1371154543.20050523180819@wicomtechnologies.com> To: David Daney CC: linux-mips Subject: Re[2]: 64 bit kernel for BCM1250 In-Reply-To: <428B6EDD.4040508@avtrex.com> References: <20050518080917.45521.qmail@web32501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <428B663C.7050308@avtrex.com> <428B6EDD.4040508@avtrex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7948 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: jerry@wicomtechnologies.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hello David, Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 7:35:41 PM, you wrote: >>>I saw this with a 32 bit kernel (for a 32 bit target). As far as I >>>know, no 2.4.x kernels from linux-mips.org will work with gcc >>>3.4.x. >> That could actually be true -- I've been using GCC 4.0.0 for quite >> some time now (that includes CVS snapshots from before the >> release), so I have no slightest idea whether it's OK to use older >> versions. ;-) >>>I have previously posted patches to this list that fixed the >>>problem for me. Specifically I think the messages in this thread >>>are relevant: >>>http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=linux-mips&i=41AFDA18.2010906%40avtrex.com >> Hasn't one of the proposed fixes for the bug made its way to Linux >> in the end? That would be regrettable... > WRT the 2.4 kernel the answer seems to be no. And yes I think it is > regrettable. If anybody thinks it would be useful, I could post my > current patch again. Hmm right now I see the same result with oops caused new_inode(pipe_mnt->mnt_sb) where pipe_mnt=0 witn 2.4 kernels and gcc3.4.3 on dbau1200. If there was any changes in patch since Dec2004, and if it hepls to solve this problem - can you please repost it again? ()_() -( ^,^ )- -[21398845]- -- -<23/05/2005 18:03>- (") (")