From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 19:57:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtprelay0024.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.24]:41028 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993911AbdBCS5V6l72x (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:57:21 +0100 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD733526D3; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:57:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: cap78_228ce2eca2c31 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1559 Received: from XPS-9350 (unknown [47.151.132.55]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1486148236.22276.72.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: Is it time to move drivers/staging/netlogic/ out of staging? From: Joe Perches To: Florian Fainelli , "Jayachandran C." Cc: Greg KH , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Ralf Baechle , linux-mips Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:57:16 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1486147623.22276.70.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 56630 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: joe@perches.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 10:50 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > (with JC's other email) And now with Greg's proper email too > On 02/03/2017 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > 64 bit stats isn't implemented, but is that really necessary? > > Anything else? > > Joe, do you have such hardware that you are interested in getting > supported, or was that just to reduce the amount of drivers in staging? > I am really not clear about what happened to that entire product line, > and whether there is any interest in having anything supported these days... No hardware. Just to reduce staging driver count.