From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 02:57:09 -0700 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:15628 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 02:57:06 -0700 Received: (qmail 23705 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2000 09:57:00 -0000 Received: from ocs3.ocs-net (192.168.255.3) by mail.ocs.com.au with SMTP; 22 Sep 2000 09:57:00 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Ralf Baechle cc: Brady Brown , SGI news group Subject: Re: ELF/Modutils problem In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:36:31 +0200." <20000921153631.A1238@bacchus.dhis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 20:57:00 +1100 Message-ID: <1690.969616620@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:36:31 +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:24:25AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: >> modutils 2.3.11 includes a sanity check on the number of local symbols >> precisely because of this MIPS problem. I agree with you that mips gcc >> is violating the ELF standard, 2.3.11 just detects this and issues an >> error message instead of overwriting memory but gcc needs to be fixed. > >And gcc has nothing to with it so it won't need to be fixed ... Point taken, I should have said the MIPS toolchain instead of gcc. Something in the toolchain is generating an ELF object that does not follow the rules. Can we catch someone's attention to get it fixed?