From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 20 May 2005 10:19:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp.wicomtechnologies.com ([IPv6:::ffff:195.234.214.162]:8138 "EHLO smtp.wicomtechnologies.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 May 2005 10:19:29 +0100 Received: from jerry (wcm-24.wicom.kiev.ua [192.168.0.24] (may be forged)) by smtp.wicomtechnologies.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4K9JIwK093571; Fri, 20 May 2005 12:19:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jerry@izmiran.rssi.ru) Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 12:20:59 +0300 From: "Ruslan V.Pisarev" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional Reply-To: "Ruslan V.Pisarev" Organization: Home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <17280353.20050520122059@wicomtechnologies.com> To: Pete Popov CC: linux-mips Subject: Re[2]: au1200 status In-Reply-To: <1116341942.5802.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1547700103.20050517142217@izmiran.rssi.ru> <1116341942.5802.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7937 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: jerry@izmiran.rssi.ru Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips >[In reply to "au1200 status" from Pete Popov to Ruslan V.Pisarev 17/05/2005 17:59] PP> The Au1200 support will from migrate from 2.4 to 2.6 when either someone PP> funds the effort or someone has time to do it for fun. A few thoughts in addition.. At my point of view, au1200 support is a big mess now. Some companies (AMD, Montawisra, etc) released their kernels which are not fully synch-ed nor with 2.4 tree at linux-mips nor with 2.6 one nor with each other. Therefore we forced to "sit and stay" on one of these old and undeveloped projects (especially most of them are commercial product (I think even if we'll need a good stable commercial product - we buy windows :)) or do the same job - make this all creepy stuff to work on last released kernel. (which will be replaced after some months with analoguis but better one from amd, mwista, mr.Jones, mrs.Addams, etc..) Have you any ideas about this? ()_() --( ^,^ )---[21398845]- -- -<20/05/2005 11:42>- (") (")