From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f736BaJ27981 for linux-mips-outgoing; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 23:11:36 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f736BaV27978 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 23:11:36 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via SMTP id XAA03764 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 23:09:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (kaos@ocs.com.au) Received: from kao2.melbourne.sgi.com (kao2.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.180]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA14871; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:10:06 +1000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Thiemo Seufer cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: ksymoops changes for mips In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:32:51 +0200." <20010628163250.D28583@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 16:10:06 +1000 Message-ID: <17478.996819006@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Resend, no response. On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:32:51 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: >Keith Owens wrote: >[snip] >> >The best option is for a mips64 kernel to indicate that it is 64 bit >> >and its endianess. Instead of printing > >The appended patch introduces the new format in mips64. Maybe this speeds >up agreement about it. :-) I am updating ksymoops now and need some information. Could somebody tell me what this produces on mips? # objdump -x ksymoops | head -8 # objdump -x mips64-lsb-vmlinux | head -8 # objdump -x mips64-msb-vmlinux | head -8 where mips64-[lm]sb-vmlinux are kernels compiled for 64 bit with LSB and MSB.