From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E37026B0AE for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 23:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759447249; cv=none; b=emT7JfJIF2SCmv4xSHWw2R4qL19s8C7Z/FG6eHX1LzSFOpLquHd6pzD095hMG8iAddDVE7sVkgKriua8McHtuC+6gZFHp8l0G6NQuMuP4X1p4t1JgrTI7ue5p6ijSWh/eSvod/B/n2eqZXy7r9Ml2NdFTAPKxzhi1/e1CfvDglc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759447249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sXiKQiWwINtaw/0i6ZrayWsPG/BbPIm1nQreVZ4vdDY=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Mime-Version; b=oN0LpJ5CO7oeIerEzNv0RuXAwA8w70TT7SK6S8tbC9cufcz2fN5Qehz9CPJD6AcKOw+VDzH2rPLLqZ7NhOA3+qY97CoDNIGK3lcyYTspDfxjbnLU9Mw+WwEjfdtltFsTpDzTp0Id/2hC/skvQlyrGn6b8mM28RMqq8HSxTncfUM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=mz5doHAh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="mz5doHAh" Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3304a57d842so1551275a91.3 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 16:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1759447246; x=1760052046; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:disposition-notification-to :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gX9KJbRliuDiUhyueXfwx/TklBf4F3VVV79ND/TcypU=; b=mz5doHAhq5A8MhgmoD739FYFCwApcY34qUfictTf8y0NjFg0GrmJSledDn5pYCMbV+ 3j3x//1jJR9PVQh/4/79UK6fkQhZ/9qQuwqLjSyJzTZgp6LPr4yLuzEh9uYe0NN68SJX rU8JZGKXiAHxR8kcMgdihJTMuWYwRZ0N8XSoBagUz/k7asMxpPKXuZzERYHk/d2Wxi1k E6wl7pUWRFTpI6qxIeWC0GoEIFXvOrm5tQYLvtVKNyB1R8IeZbhsh0mY80T1KNZ2F+Fy b1hAzQz9mEPm2F7+ecc8ydrD0eHSu/SAT2BpqM3W1Eaa8DVLGxwH8Zpxios3qNGGkbEk RPiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759447246; x=1760052046; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:disposition-notification-to :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gX9KJbRliuDiUhyueXfwx/TklBf4F3VVV79ND/TcypU=; b=oaoxFQ1UlTVmCWeOgxS/e9dkB/VXeA8/RFzMuPwIwAUtwTIaGDKvlikgJ6QJ4MZS2k 08kbhgW0/9S/SCd8sCDlEwoxBSB1uTXD2fQ5fJd8fmf6FFlsQBr/dfvtWvCmvxqPEWw/ OnqdaBSxMcQtiky1+U1c6drF15D/BRRknbF5mUuuY8rJKY37qXz3Mv7/nIy8NgJXZYry g5Ib1b7qpu3OcAkoi/6sFl7FWYJo2azOzxzjHn/+CWpeFtyF+s3tqUiEKJQYukCwhpPF hz3SgmL7o3Hljb8PeKFB0YhsstMK1oz5WxuOVy0sYC0joNHtRsieGtiYlN4Z9U9lvbZv Ljkw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVEwMFarQb4HlnCy4ykwR5KaZ17CzsyrXtpxPjyAh9YyQIt0WPXMex7UP7BIT0aSuQwmgrbYBIKnqGZ@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzgQLRsJZQ4i2PW+SAu5lmwRpfNwEXIgo2NlPcJTm2IAn84V+vW vCvTvMOJXjERoOZpVW8tagjLRFFU4Zar+vv1MFkA7EuXzhr42YVFtHE7CsTFnHEopA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctfCUtg3KWu7E+JWOrlzfJu5HRShuLPoht8CoZWHFelpflrBt8uEPaRkfopo43 JnlU+rG3hrWhBn+RG8rBGlls9yWu492DhdGd2vABwhmfQED9ZqKbxa5j5jGRc+0SPXnE6dcClbn D42xiYpgKKO33rY/yHjKuRc0qrtf6mp0iwk5TA3OyCItDf5nl0dTHLETAXwKTHsMV5IF2wxzJNi Dw1TF1QeKkyl/lY4gQ67H2UGGGUrio8Clj8QxtwaazqcUxknw4NderB6IZMFFuuCbHxIgJK2pE3 Wvd5dOKROCZDNMxwYO33Z8KIUcolQUvV1ERtAXRUvK40P13wPTSx7vbTckJXImWpboV1RyBsk2e hkpiqFw1GG1PiUm0Gao+nDBx/6u3GfdwTaBj7S1VWU0OEdLoabo9QkZy35Xwrmq+tyAuCdH+GFf E/NEj80zsAZ5JzO6t0GDaHsB+7fXjpnPFs4Bp24OlOLJo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFxx2TCD6D7jFtBEJ3PbntsdESkjjeH5wij8/VnSkkJDYC5xpM48nDuzXv8UOwcied9Nu59sA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17cc:b0:32e:5cba:ae11 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-339c27859aamr1054843a91.28.1759447246577; Thu, 02 Oct 2025 16:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:5a8:429d:8700:4825:53c7:1977:212e? ([2001:5a8:429d:8700:4825:53c7:1977:212e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-339a6ff0dddsm5947685a91.18.2025.10.02.16.20.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Oct 2025 16:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1759447244.24579.14.camel@chimera> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] CMDLINE: x86: convert to generic builtin command line From: Daniel Gimpelevich To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" , Will Deacon , Christophe Leroy , Rob Herring , Andrew Morton , Pratyush Brahma , Tomas Mudrunka , Sean Anderson , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" , Ruslan Ruslichenko , Ruslan Bilovol , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 16:20:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20231110013817.2378507-1-danielwa@cisco.com> <20231110013817.2378507-7-danielwa@cisco.com> <00c11f75-7400-4b2a-9a5d-10fc62363835@intel.com> <1759444692.24579.8.camel@chimera> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2025-10-02 at 16:10 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > How is the approach to "keep it atomic" working out so far? ;) > > The kernel isn't exactly developed in secret. It's also not hard at all > to, say, once a week to peek at linux-next and do a lore search (or use > lei) if anyone is desperately worried about the ~50 lines per > architecture going out of sync. With all due respect, the lack of action on this patchset is not at all due to its scope, but purely due to the throwing-spaghetti-at-the-wall approach to code review that you yourself just got done pointing out. Addressing the latter problem would thereby also address the former.